A. I know you would agree and indeed support
our Doctors are doing the best often at the expense of their own Health to
manage the multitude of ever changing symptoms a Person would present to
them for treatment?
A. You are correct in your assertions - right from the
beginning of time when a Person showed signs and symptoms of Dis-ease, there
have been - as far as my little bit of experience is able to count in the
true process of illness cause; there are but two People implicated.
1. Now; if we allow ourselves to accept that Adam and
Eve were indeed our originating Parents and this protocol existed.
A. May we collect the information; Parents
cause illness, Child becomes a Victim and Professionals are seeking with
non-existing science to improve a Person's Health; but failing to recognise,
this is not only not so, they are often as not - causing later illnesses with
the many reported side-effects of medications?
A. Of course - the reality is there are so many
contributors to modern Scientifically Proven Medicine one can only judge the
value by the proven facts - there are more People in the world today than
ever with Mental or Biological Illnesses, taking one or more medications to
manage their symptoms and no one it appears ever fully recovers - even when
taking into account the increase of the worlds Population.
A. Whilst is necessary to
accept the eloquent finding of Milgram's Peers last updated in 2002 in
citing his work - item E. 2.
A. Whilst it is of course; humanly important
to feel for. Not only the Professor but his Family as well to lose such a
brilliant Mind at such a tender young age.
A. If one were to survey say one thousand
People then the possibility exists - not one of them would be aware of
A. When one includes this from Item
"He also reached out to honorary Harvard University
graduate Chaim Homnick, who noted that this experiment would not be concrete
evidence of the Nazis' innocence, due to fact that; "poor People are more
likely to cooperate."
A. It is clear that Milgram and any
researchers that followed in his footsteps only ever succeeded in
replicating failure to comprehend - the Mind and its ability to remain in
control no matter what silly games it is ordered to participate in.
B. Milgram can for the time be somewhat excused for
his lack of Scientific Inquiry into not only the Mind - as in 2017 it is
only just being observed as implicit in illness, but within his own Mind in order
to comprehend what he was actually doing the experiments for.
Following one and preceding the other - everything
in between is no more than an opinion each of has a fundamental right too.
A. This is not in any way to be
considered we are able to live life without the rules we all subscribe
to or should have no rules applied to the public life we lead - no more
than it is to be seen as a belief - as a race of People we could live
the comfortable life we do without the protection Our dedicated: Police, Soldiers,
Sailors and Air personnel of all three
forces continually provide for us.
B. It is however in keeping with the findings of Professor Stanley
Milgram and the long-term values such experiments have perhaps delivered
to the populations that left many question unasked and as many
unanswered for not only clinicians of the Psychological Mental health
but Biological physicians as well.
C. Particularly relating to the
Holocaust in Section 20 and Data Manipulation Section 21 and the rational
behind such Human, applied atrocities and manipulating behaviours.
Conclusion. Then we can examine the rational
behind the entire population of the world starting at the very
top degree of society through Bankers, lobbyists, Politicians - let us
not beat about the bush; everyone - no exceptions.
Question. 1. What is an Order Follower?
Answer. 1. It appears Order followers are the People who
keep the system
of slavery in place.
Question. 2. Is that saying
- not as we have always believed - The Ruling Class are the
Answer. 2. Nor the so called elite - which are not the elite of anything; as this is in reality only a demonstration of high Anxiety
that has to be or has been relieved.
Question. 3. Please interpret?
Answer. 3. The reality is - the so called Elite are only those
with a very Low value of self-worth and control of others is a way of
increasing their Estimation; if only in their own eyes or those of
similar desires or values.
Question. 4. How then can Order
Followers be defined?
Answer. 4. Order followers are
the People who keep slavery in place or the People and who willfully follow
Question. 5. That appears somewhat far to truthful
- how do you think
People will react?
Answer. 5. It is the truth
nobody wants to hear and it is fair to say. People will hate you for
Question. 6. What then does following orders really mean?
Answer. 6. Following orders means by
definition - doing what you are told to do without judging for yourself
whether or not the action that
you have been ordered to carry out is actually; Right or Wrong.
Question. 7. Can
anybody refute that not the actual definition of following someone
Answer. 7. It must be acceptable to all - if one is following the orders given to you and then
one just does
it; you are following the orders.
8. Would one not question the orders?
definition if you are following orders. You do not sit and
ponder or even question. "was the order that Person just gave me right - do I have a
Moral or Legal right to do that or wrong I should do that; because it is
ok and does not hurt anyone or should I not do that, because it does
cause others harm.
Question. 9. Where would this leave a Person?
Answer. 9. Surely. It is not what an Order Follower Person
does in their Mind when they concede say yes sir and follows the order
that is important - it is to obediently obey the instructions. that is why they are called an
So is that really the actual definition of an Order
Answer. 10. Surly it is not a perception of Order Following
- the fact is; a Person of significant authority or sometimes not, gives
an order and less significant others follow the instructions received.
Is demonstration enough.
Question. 11. Are we to understand in
blindly following orders we have given up our free will?
In an individual this is key to understanding the performing of
test is of following orders.
B. Thus by definition an individual cannot be
exercising their conscience or conscious free will - since by definition
exercising conscience or conscious free will; means that one is willfully choosing through their
own free will for themselves.
Question. 12. Where if at all does Right Action over Wrong Action
fit with the study or even life?
concept of Following Orders is completely Polar Opposite to the concept
of exercising conscience decision to not follow orders - as one cannot
do two things simultaneously; they are a contradictions in terms.
B. This can be expressed with; One cannot be Objective and Subjective on
oneself at the same time.
C. Simply put. Look in on oneself and look out from oneself at the same
Question. 13. Explanation please?
Being Objective and Subjective - looking out from oneself and looking in
at the same time; as one will always compromise the other.
definition of following orders one cannot be actually
exercising conscious decision making which involves free will choice based on
ones prior knowledge of right and wrong.
Question. 14. It appear Following Orders can be both good and bad, how
does one differentiate?
Answer. 14. On the face of it one
may be minded to agree - however. Here is what Order following gets us as
far as our nations are concerned for it appears we have all been taken
in covertly or underhandedly by what is known as the New World Order not
that these People or Order Followers had not already been taken in
Question. 15. Are there any examples to demonstrate this is so?
A. One may consider.
The Psychotics or Weak willed in Believing. "We," as a race of People
could not be beaten militarily
as they did not have the might - thus being Order Followers took
us into the school system - thus the school system is used to get into
the Minds of Children in Order to create and maintain control.
B. Surely if
one does not believe this happens; one is possibly very naive and in so being; an Order
Follower, yet is not aware of it.
Question. 16. Knowing how us Humans have to box or Label
something how would one categories. Order Following?
Answer. 16. This is just one of the
many forms of socialism or feudalism as demonstrated by the Nazis but the
Communists as well.
Question. 17. How would one describe
Answer. 17. Perhaps the true definition
of World Wide Socialism is - there is no such thing a private property; the
state own everything, rights do not exist, property rights do not exist
and everyone is a feudal surf again.
Is this is what is known as - Neo Feudalism?
A. If one
wants to come at this from the left it is called Communism and from the
right it is called National Socialism.
B. Communism is a
National Socialism they are both the same force - called Feudalism which in itself is another word for slavery.
New World Order desire is Neo Feudalism slavery and it is already here it is not
something that is coming.
What is NWO and what does it do to or for society?
As of 2017 it appears the objective of the New World Order is as yet not
clear - thus it is a process rather than a controlling body.
B. However with the power certain segments of society are putting
into delivering it - the object may be better served if we as a race of
People stop this NWO and in so doing get out of it; as it may well be
only as a result of blindly Orders Following from an as yet unknown
So are we saying - Blindly Following orders must never be seen as a
virtue; as it is evil?
Surely one must show caution to this suggestion and in so doing be
allowed to demonstrate - in keeping with ones fellow Humans; common
sense and ones own free will to say. "No I will not do that," to an
order that clearly has Immoral, Illegal, unseen or pure - evil
How may we clearly explain this?
one should not have to concern oneself as action should be natural and
automatic - against a Person who gives an order if of high
social-political position or even a representative of churches of any
and all denominations; if the order clearly has some form of Illegal,
Immoral or Evil Intentions.
2. If one carries out the order this is
tantamount to having just committed an act of evil oneself.
B. If one acts based on the orders of another
Person and yet do not agree with its intentions and act on the order;
one has just committed
an act of evil - there is no Morality in the action at all.
It is not a virtue
- it is evil. Moreover under these circumstances there is no moral act
of following orders, the
two terms are contradictory.
addition. In an attempt to defend ones actions by saying. "I was just following orders" is never a
valid excuse or justification for following immoral orders or criminal
behaviour or valid excuse to abdicate personal responsibility.
E. Thus should never
be accepted as a valid excuse for such behaviour.
So are we suggesting. "I was just doing my job" has some legal standing?
It appears the justification for this was created through the right to make and
create laws - from the Latin. "Jus = "right
Law" and the Latin verb. Facere = "to make create" and this is what a
Person say a Policeman or a Soldier
say. "I was just following orders, I was just doing my job by shutting
down your demonstration or protest - you do not have a right to speak; the
politicians commanded you, so I just came out to do my job.
So are we or are we not saying; under these circumstances. "I was Just
doing my job, just carrying out my orders - is a justification?"
course as we have previously discussed there are times when one must
one must surely have the Legal and Moral right or obligation to justify
for oneself - as to whether the orders have a good intentions or not.
such orders and blindly following them is criminal - meaning there
is nothing moral OR virtuous in them.
That it is called: criminal behaviour,
criminal activity and what the Order givers do - is try to create in
those Blindly following orders is their right - a
No one should ever accept this as a justification act in such a manner - as psychotic behaviour
has no real justification or
value or a is a complete lie.
Is negative illegal or immoral activity any better than looking in another's face and
saying. "I am not responsible for that I just did it I was following
thus acting on orders received?"
Answer. 24. This defence did not work as the
What is the Nuremburg Defence and how does it fit into Milgram's
Phew and I thought I had lost you for a while.
A. Should we
all be accepting now - just because we believe in the legitimacy of
authority - which in
reality is often Mind Control; That People believe; there is legitimacy
to this type of criminal behaviour, because there is a class of People
called government who have magically been imbued and gifted with such rights
of control that they believe they have rights others do not.
B. Moreover the
People affected with such criminal behaviour really believe the Order givers have
Conclusion. Is it
possible there is always a hidden agenda behind orders that appear to,
or do promote. Immoral and or illegal Activity.
Are you now able to respond to my question. "What is the Nuremburg
Defence and how does it fit into Milgram's Obedience Experiments?
May we first concern ourselves with the Nuremburg Defence - which
may well be the very foundation of Milgram's requirement to experiment.
orders, often known as the Nuremberg defense, lawful orders or by the
German phrase Befehl ist Befehl. "only following orders," literally, "an
order is an order," is a plea in a court of law that a Person - whether
a member of the military, law enforcement, a firefighting force, or the
civilian population; not be held guilty for actions which were ordered
by a superior officer or an official.
superior orders plea is often regarded as the complement to command
C. One of the
most noted uses of this plea, or defense, was by the accused in the
1945–1946 Nuremberg trials, such that it is also called; "The Nuremberg
Nuremberg Trials were a series of military tribunals, held by the main
victorious Allied forces after World War II, most notable for the
prosecution of prominent members of the political, military and economic
leadership of the defeated Nazi Germany.
E. It was
during these trials, under the London Charter of the International
Military Tribunal which set them up, that the defense of superior orders
was no longer considered enough to escape punishment; but merely enough
to lessen punishment.
Historically, the plea of superior orders has been used both before and
after the Nuremberg Trials, with a notable lack of consistency in
A. Apart from
the specific plea of superior orders, discussions about how the general
concept of superior orders ought to be used, or ought not to be used,
have taken place in various arguments, rulings and statutes that have
not necessarily been part of “after the fact” war crimes trials,
B. Nevertheless, these discussions and related events
help to explain the evolution of the specific plea of superior orders
and the history of its usage.
not fair to say from the highest official in each
country down through the ranks to the Policeman in our cities Soldiers
and Sailors and Air Force personnel in a foreign or our
own land upholding or fighting for peace - if a Person in the street was
given an order and would not carry out the order; would they not
be imprisoned or executed as a Traitor to their country.
B. Should not the LAW stand and
act both ways if later the Orders were shown to be of immoral or illegal
C. Surely we all know what is
right and what is wrong and thus cease manipulating the Laws in order to
protect the real Order Givers and their reason behind the Immoral or
D. In addition - if we still in
the year 2017 do not know the cause of any illness; nor have any cures,
do we really understand the process or the long-term outcome of health
and well being of our Populations from such Impossible Orders and does
anyone in authority actually care.
The 1998 Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court.
Headquarters of the
International Criminal Court in The Hague
The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court - often referred to
as the International Criminal Court Statute or the Rome Statute is the
treaty that established the International Criminal Court - ICC.
B. It was
adopted at a diplomatic conference in Rome on 17 July 1998 and it
entered into force on 1 July 2002.
C. As of
March 2016, 124 states are party to the statute.
other things, the statute establishes the court's functions,
jurisdiction and structure.
E. The Rome
Statute established four core international crimes: genocide, crimes
against humanity, war crimes and the crime of aggression.
crimes; "shall not be subject to any statute of limitations."
G. Under the
Rome Statute, the ICC can only investigate and prosecute the four core
international crimes in situations where states are; "unable," or
"unwilling," to do so themselves.
H. The court
has jurisdiction over crimes only if they are committed in the territory
of a state party or if they are committed by a national of a state
party; an exception to this rule is that the ICC may also have
jurisdiction over crimes if its jurisdiction is authorized by the United
Nations Security Council.
years of negotiation, aimed at establishing a permanent international
tribunal to prosecute individuals accused of genocide and other serious
international crimes, such as crimes against humanity, war crimes and
crimes of aggression, the United Nations General Assembly convened a
five-week diplomatic conference in Rome in June 1998; "to finalize and
adopt a convention on the establishment of an international criminal
J. On 17 July
1998, the Rome Statute was adopted by a vote of 120 to 7, with 21
the way each delegation voted was officially unrecorded, there is some
dispute over the identity of the seven countries that voted against the
L. It is
certain that the People's Republic of China, Israel and the United
States were three of the seven because they have publicly confirmed
their negative votes; India, Indonesia, Iraq, Libya, Qatar, Russia,
Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Yemen have been identified by various observers
and commentators as possible sources for the other four negative votes,
with Iraq, Libya, Qatar and Yemen being the four most commonly
Once again I state the Law is not in my remit - however; I do feel if
only for my own Life, I know right from wrong, although one has to say
perhaps not always practiced it.
is obliged to question with a ruling so important what ulterior motive
was exerted by Rome and significant others.
C. Why was
such an important historical law allowed to be passed with so many
countries being allowed to abstain from voting
D. What was
the real reason Israel abstained - when one considers they may well have
had most to gain.
the United States of America being such a close ally of Israel why did
they abstain from voting for such an import world wide collaboration on
the often hidden historical atrocities of War.
F. Or were
the abstainers all just Following Orders - if so; who was or is the
perhaps Secret. Master Order Giver.
A. Hagenbach on trial, from Berner Chronik
des Diebold Schilling dem Älteren.
B. In 1474, in the trial of Peter von
Hagenbach by an ad hoc tribunal of the Holy Roman Empire, the first
known "international" recognition of a commanders' obligations to act
C. Hagenbach offered the defense - that he
was just following orders, but this defense was rejected and he was
convicted of war crimes and beheaded.
D. Specifically, Hagenbach was put on trial
for atrocities committed under his command but not by him directly,
during the occupation of Breisach.
E. This was the earliest modern European
example of the doctrine of command responsibility.
F. Since he was convicted for crimes; "he
as a knight was deemed to have a duty to prevent," Hagenbach defended
himself by arguing that he was only following orders from the Duke of
Burgundy, Charles the Bold, to whom the Holy Roman Empire had given
Breisach. This defense was rejected.
A. It appears quite
reasonable to observe - the confusion of Following Orders and
responsibility had a long history of confusion as to who bore Ultimate
Responsibility of any negative outcomes; where there were no winners,
only the victims of such atrocities. That no one in realty knew from who
the orders emanated from.
B. In addition one may well ask
- what was the Holy Roman Empires
involvement in matters of France and what was their ulterior motive.
C. Or were all those involved
just Following Orders - if so;
who was or is the perhaps Secret. Master
Superior Orders 2.
A. History from 1900 to 1947.
B. German military trials after World
C. On June 4, 1921, the legal doctrine
of superior orders was used during the German Military Trials that took
place after World War I: One of the most famous of these trials was the
matter of Lieutenant Karl Neumann, who was a U-boat captain responsible
for the sinking of the hospital ship the Dover Castle.
D. Even though he frankly admitted to
having sunk the ship, he stated that he had done so on the basis of
orders supplied to him by the German Admiralty and so he could not be
held liable for his actions.
E. The Reichsgericht, then Germany's
supreme court, acquitted him, accepting the defense of superior orders
as a grounds to escape criminal liability.
that very court had this to say in the matter of superior orders:
that all civilized nations
recognize the principle that a subordinate is covered by the orders of
G. Many accused of war crimes were
acquitted on a similar defense, creating immense dissatisfaction among
That has been thought to be one of
the main causes for the specific removal of this defense in the August
8, 1945 London Charter of the International Military Tribunal.
I. The removal has been attributed to
the actions of Robert H. Jackson, a Justice of the United States Supreme
Court, who was appointed Chief Prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials.
A. Although the Sinking of the
Dover Castle - torpedoed by the German U-boat UC-67 on 26 May
1917, while 50 miles - 80 km north of Bône on passage from Malta to
appeared to be only due to involvement of the war between
Germany and The United Kingdom. Once again the Master Order Giver escaped
detection as no one was found guilty of yet another atrocity of War.
B. At the time of the sinking of the Dover Castle it was
still sixteen years or so before the birth of Stanley Milgram.
C. However as the
1939-45 war arrived by the time he was Six and his family lived in
America - are we really to understand feelings did not run high and
increased even higher when news of the Holocaust Atrocities arrived in America.
Where no one of Jewish decent could do anything about it; other than sit around a table
and scream at the Germans.
D. Given the years of gestation
from birth in 1933 until his Experiments on Obedience in 1960/1
should one not ask, "was all of this unwitting education affecting
Milgram," thereby preparing him for the fatal heart attack in 1984 and
was it this process that gave him the Creativity as the Brakes on
Madness of being in America and doing nothing to help his fellow
Israeli countryman and Women.
A. Dostler was tied to a stake before
B. On October 8, 1945, Anton Dostler was
the first German general to be tried for war crimes by a US military
tribunal at the Royal Palace in Caserta.
C. He was accused of ordering the
execution of 15 captured US soldiers of Operation Ginny II in Italy in
D. He admitted to ordering the execution
but said that he could not be held responsible because he was following
orders from his superiors.
E. The execution of the prisoners of war
in Italy, ordered by Dostler, was an implementation of Adolf Hitler's
Commando Order of 1942 which required the immediate execution of all
Allied commandos, whether they were in proper uniforms or not, without
trial if they were apprehended by German forces.
F. The tribunal rejected the defense of
Superior Orders and found Dostler guilty of war crimes.
G. He was sentenced to death and
executed by a firing squad on December 1, 1945, in Aversa.
H. The Dostler case became a precedent
for the principle that was used in the Nuremberg Trials of German
generals, officials and Nazi leaders beginning in November 1945: using
superior orders as a defense does not relieve officers from
responsibility of carrying out illegal orders and their liability to be
punished in court.
I. The principle was codified in
Principle IV of the Nuremberg Principles and similar principles were
found in sections of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Once again the Master Order Giver escaped detection as no one was
really found guilty of yet another atrocity of War - for if we are to
accept Dostler in this case was guilty as charged should not ALL of the
order givers right to the very top have been charged with war crimes and
if they were not - should we not ask. "Why."
B. Again we must ask. Yet. only if we
are able to accept the rules relating to Orders Followers are
fundamentally flawed - as it appears they are only applied in order to
hide the true Order Givers complicity in the actions of the Order
Followers; what was the real impact on Milgram leading to his
experiments and more importunely was he aware of same or just
unwittingly following orders.
Nuremberg Trials after World War II.
A. In 1945 and 1946, during the
Nuremberg trials the issue of Superior's Orders again arose.
B. Before the end of World War II, the
Allies suspected such a defense might be employed and issued the London
Charter of the International Military Tribunal - IMT, which explicitly
stated that following an unlawful order is not a valid defense against
charges of war crimes.
under Nuremberg Principle IV, "defense of Superior's Orders" is not a defense for war crimes, although
it might be a mitigating factor that could influence a sentencing
authority to lessen the penalty. Nuremberg Principle IV states:
D. "The fact that a Person acted
pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve
him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice
was in fact possible to him."
E. During the Nuremberg Trials, Wilhelm
Keitel, Alfred Jodl and other defendants unsuccessfully used the
F. In most cases, the tribunal found
that the defendants' offenses were so egregious - outstandingly
bad, shocking. That obedience to superior orders could not be
considered a mitigating factor.
Once again the Master Order Giver escaped detection - as no one was
really found guilty of yet another atrocity of War; for if we are to
accept in this case: Wilhelm Keitel, Alfred Jodl and other
defendants were guilty as charged. Should not ALL of the
order givers right to the very top have been charged with war crimes and
if they were not - should we not ask. "Why."
Surely no one ever carries out such atrocities reported as War
Crimes on their own accord - unless they have a diagnosable
psychological disorder. Then one must surely question the superiors
motive for promoting such a Person into a rank having such authority
B. Again we must ask. Yet. only if we
are able to accept the rules relating to Orders Followers are
fundamentally flawed - as it appears they are only applied in order to
hide the true Order Givers complicity in the actions of the Order
C. What then we must ask - was the real impact on Milgram leading to his
experiments and more importunately; was he aware of such impact or just
unwittingly Following Orders.
D. Is this not a sign of things
to come in the future as we in the United Kingdom and I suspect many
other countries of the world the law of the land appears to have been
turned on its head.
Thus if you are a criminal and
convicted you are given leave by the presiding judge to; "return to your
family they need you." And if you are a victim - as a result sentenced
to a lifetime of emotional pain and often physical discomfort; thus are
guilty as charged.
Nuremberg Trials after World War II.
Question 1. Has no
one ever come to the defence of People that have no option but to follow
their Superior's Orders?
Answer. 1. it
appears in history there is one Person themself a Person of Significance
- if one dare to make such a comment.
A. It is
reported. Mahatma Gandhi said.
"You assist an evil
system most effectively by obeying its orders and decrees."
What is the meaning behind Gandhi's comment?
A. Surely it
must go without saying. An evil system
never deserves such allegiance. Allegiance to it means; partaking of the
evil a good Person will resist an evil system with his or her whole
soul which means - saying no to such orders.
It appears People do follow orders... yet military and law
enforcement officers are allowed to break orders if they feel it is an unlawful
If one served one may well find there have been plenty of soldiers
who have turned
down orders because they were unlawful.
Perhaps we should not blame the military and
call them all mindless slaves to their masters who follow any command
given to them.
F. There are more good then bad in both those groups.
The difference between Nazi, Soviet era soldiers
and America's soldiers is... Nazi and Soviet Officers would kill a
Person and their family for disobeying orders.
Does this not make somewhat a mockery of any law as it appears there is
one for the rank and file and another for the officers and high Ranking
commanders that give all military orders in the first place.
Once again we must ask where exactly does Milgram's experiments on
Obedience fit in and what is the real purpose behind them - was he aware
of the real reason and how is at all is this all implicated in his early
And more importantly from where in real and undeniable terms did the
orders come from and what was their real intention.
New World Order.
It appears we have said a lot but not really come to any satisfactory
conclusions about Milgram's Experiments - why is this?
On that I am unable to disagree - the reason may well be hidden from
view but in plain sight.
What do you mean by that?
It is clear that the skill in giving orders that have not
only a devastating effect is to do it in such a manner or by devious
devices change the laws of many lands in order to protect the real order
givers and at the same time create something unseen yet in plain sight
for all to see.
And that is?
appears since early to mid 2016 - although the process has been
insidiously been creeping up on everyone over many years; the world is a
much changed place and there is much more to come.
B. On the
one hand it has become more transparent - yet on the other hand more
secret and devious as to the intent and Milgram's Experiment is at the
heart of the change but only in recent times; as the process has been
going on very much longer than most if not all would give credence too.
That sounds about as devious as the process you are trying to
A. I agree -
moreover the real truth may well not show itself for many decades to
B. Let us
start with words our major Order givers the world stage Politicians
started using in earnest a year or two ago:
1. New World Order.
Mostly and even from my own point of view - always meant an Entity or a
Governing Body. whereas it may well mean; "Now We Own," or
Order," or even. "Nuremberg Will Out."
thereby hiding up the true
intentions of - as a Significant Order Giver in history once said.
"Control the Money control the politicians and the law."
That is a bit heavy - is it not? But is there a deeper message hidden in
Fortunately it is not my words as all of it has long been in the public
Whether this is the truth or not is of no consequence - it is the
implication that is more significant; as it relies on People following
orders to come to fruition.
C. Let us
for understanding sake call the New World Order a business process
and ask just
who owns it. runs it or better said - gives the orders and what is the
real reason behind it as it clearly appears it is a world domination type of
control we only read of in James Bond type Movies.
D. And -
Yes there is a message; hidden in plain sight and Milgram himself
exposed it, but never spoke in plain language...
experiments were for himself the teachers and the learners and even the
observers to test a hypotheses. "if one creates a powerful Anxiety;"
will just the recipients relieve it - wittingly or unwittingly by just
blindly obeying orders. Or simply reject the orders as their conscience
would not allow them to obey.
So if the New World Order is a process how may we explain or
I have to confess this is above my pay grade of historically proven
facts and more importantly way before my time on this planet and anyone
event happened that was adopted locally - yet as the populations
traversed the world went with them where all participants carried with
them an unrelievable Anxiety where they could not remember the event
happening to them - thus did not know the cause. Yet is was accepted as
a Family or Religious Tradition.
C. It is
this as I see things that created the desire for the
New World Order or
Now We Own one or both yet to come to full maturity.
Is it fair to suggest you are talking of an event between
two and say seven thousand years ago?
A. If we accept this is true.
Although it may well take a fair degree of reading between the lines in
Order to connect the event many hundreds of years ago; Between Milgram's
experiment and driving force it appears the Holocaust and the NWO.
a more recent event that may assist in understanding the reason for
Milgram's Experiment in Obedience?
St Louis Voyage of the Dammed.
1. The MS St. Louis was a German ocean
liner. In 1939, it set off on a voyage in which its captain, Gustav
Schröder, tried to find homes for over 900 Jewish refugees from Germany.
2. After they were denied entry to Cuba,
the United States and Canada, the refugees were finally accepted in
various European countries, including Belgium, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom
3. Historians have estimated that
approximately a quarter of them died in death camps during World War II.
4. The event was the subject of a 1974
book, Voyage of the Damned, by Gordon Thomas and Max Morgan-Witts.
5. It was adapted for a 1976 U.S. film of
the same title and a 1994 opera titled "St. Louis Blues" by Chiel
A. It is reasonable to consider
the general public were not made aware of the general state of unrest
leading up to the breakout of World War two.
B. The many governments
throughout the world would have been.
C. Leaving one to question was
there a hidden motive in the MS St Louis being sent on such an obviously
very perilous journey.
D. Moreover; What was the true
motive and who gave the orders for local politicians to follow - giving
the People on board false hope the run around and the carrot dangling of
the few selected to remain on foreign ground; that sent them all back
where they came from.
E. Many as reported to certain
deaths in the various so called German Death Camps and yet left many
survivors in other countries to tell the tale.
St Louis - Background.
A. Built by the Bremer Vulkan shipyards in
Bremen for the Hamburg America Line, the St. Louis was a diesel-powered
ship and properly referred to with the prefix. "MS" or "MV," but she is
often known as the. "SS St. Louis." The ship was named after the city of
St. Louis, Missouri.
B. The St. Louis regularly sailed the
trans-Atlantic route from Hamburg to Halifax, Nova Scotia and New York
and made cruises to the Canary Islands, Madeira and Morocco.
C. The St. Louis was built for both
transatlantic liner service and for leisure cruises.
St Louis Voyage of the Dammed 2.
1. The St. Louis set sail from Hamburg to
Cuba on May 13, 1939. The vessel under command of Captain Gustav
Schröder was carrying 937 passengers, most of them Jewish refugees
seeking asylum from Nazi persecution.
2. Captain Schröder was a non-Jewish
German who went to great lengths to ensure dignified treatment for his
3. The journey to Cuba was a joyous
4. The passengers aboard the St. Louis had
suffered ill-treatment in Germany, but on board, they were treated very
well, at the insistence of Captain Schröder.
5. Food served included items subject to
rationing in Germany and Childcare was available while Parents dined.
6. Dances and concerts were put on and on
Friday evenings, religious services were held in the dining room.
7. A bust of Hitler there was covered by a
8. Swimming lessons took place in the
9. Lothar Molton, a boy traveling with his
Parents, said that the passengers thought of it as; "a vacation cruise to
10. The ship dropped anchor at 04:00 on May
27 at the far end of the Havana harbor and was denied entry to the usual
11. The next six days on the harbor were
12. The Cuban government, headed by
President Federico Laredo Brú, refused to accept the foreign refugees.
13. Although passengers had previously
purchased legal visas, they could not enter Cuba either as tourists -
laws related to tourist visas or as refugees
seeking political asylum had recently been changed.
14. On May 5, 1939, four months before
World War II began, Havana abandoned its former pragmatic immigration
policy and instead issued Decree 937, which "restricted entry of all
foreigners except U.S. citizens requiring a bond of $500 and
authorization by the Cuban secretaries of state and labor.
15. Permits and
visas issued before May 5 were invalidated retroactively."
16. None of the passengers were aware that
the Cuban government had retroactively invalidated their landing
17. In the end, only 29 passengers were
allowed to disembark in Cuba.
18. Twenty-two of them were Jewish and had
valid US visas; the remaining six-four Spanish citizens and two Cuban
nationals-had valid entry documents.
19. Another passenger, after attempting to
commit suicide, was evacuated to a hospital in Havana.
20. Telephone records show American
officials Cordell Hull, Secretary of State and Henry Morgenthau,
Secretary of the Treasury had made some efforts to persuade Cuba to
accept the refugees.
21. Their actions, together with efforts of
the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, were not successful.
22. Prohibited from landing in Cuba, the
St. Louis and the remaining 907 refugees headed towards the United
23. Captain Schröder circled off the coast
of Florida, hoping for permission to enter the United States.
24. Cordell Hull, Secretary of State,
advised Roosevelt not to accept the Jews, however. Captain Schröder
considered running aground along the coast to allow the refugees to
escape, but, acting on Cordell Hull's instructions, US Coast Guard
vessels shadowed the ship and prevented such a move.
25. After the St. Louis was turned away from
the United States, a group of academics and clergy in Canada tried to
persuade Canada's Prime Minister, William Lyon Mackenzie King, to
provide sanctuary to the ship's passengers, as it was only two days from
Halifax, Nova Scotia.
26. But Canadian immigration official
Frederick Blair, hostile to Jewish immigration, persuaded King on June 9
not to intervene. In 2000, Former United Kingdom Prime Minister Tony Blair's nephew apologized to the Jewish
People for his uncle's action.
27. The situation of the vessel
deteriorated as Captain Schröder negotiated and schemed to find them a
28. At one point he formulated plans to
wreck the ship on the British coast to force the passengers to be taken
29. He refused to return the ship to
Germany until all the passengers had been given entry to some other
30. US officials worked with Britain and
European nations to find refuge for the travelers in Europe.
31. The ship returned to Europe, docking at
Antwerp, Belgium, on June 17, 1939 with 907 passengers.
32. The United Kingdom agreed to take 288
of the passengers - 32 percent, who disembarked and traveled to the UK
via other steamers.
33. After much negotiation by Schröder, the
remaining 619 passengers were allowed to disembark at Antwerp; 224 were
accepted by France - 25 percent, 214 by Belgium - 23.59 percent and 181
by the Netherlands - 20 percent.
34. Without any passengers, the ship
returned to Hamburg.
35. The following year, after the Nazi
German invasions of Belgium, France and the Netherlands in May 1940, all
the Jews in those countries were at renewed risk, including the recent
36. St. Louis Captain Gustav Schröder
negotiates landing permits for the passengers with Belgian officials in
the Port of Antwerp.
37. By using the survival rates for Jews in
various countries, Thomas and Morgan-Witts, the authors of Voyage of the
Damned, estimated that 180 of the St. Louis refugees in France, 152 of
those in Belgium, and 60 of those in the Netherlands survived the
38. Including the passengers who landed in
England, of the original 936 refugees - one man died during the voyage,
roughly 709 survived the war and 227 did not.
39. Later research by Scott Miller and Sarah
Ogilvie of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum did an actual
historical trace on the fate of each passenger.
40. They determined that 254 of those who
returned to continental Europe were murdered during the Holocaust:
A. "Of the 620 St.
Louis passengers who returned to continental Europe, we determined that
eighty-seven were able to emigrate before Germany invaded western Europe
on May 10, 1940.
B. Two hundred
fifty-four passengers in Belgium, France and the Netherlands after that
date died during the Holocaust.
C. Most of these
were murdered in the killing centers of Auschwitz and Sobibór; the rest
died in internment camps, in hiding or attempting to evade the Nazis.
D. Three hundred
sixty-five of the 620 passengers who returned to continental Europe
survived the war.
E. Of the 288
passengers sent to Britain, the vast majority were alive at war's end."
A. In order
to understand this section one must first remember the reasons for
desiring to seek shelter in another country.
it appears the first mention of a Nazi concentration camps were in
1933 - further; it appears it was not until around 1941 mass murder in
what became known as the Holocaust Death Camps were instigated.
what part was the fact the World was not at war at the time of the
sailing - play in the seemingly wondrous life saving Boat Trip.
D. All of
this section reeks of Psychotic Behaviour. A Psychotic will by being
extra nice Lull the Person into a sense of false security. Items 1>9.
E. Once the
victim believes the Psychotic is really a nice Person the Psychotic will
then attempt to convince their victim they are really doing every thing
to be of help to the Victim Items 10>30, then 31>33.
achieved they will not only turn on the Person but will be nasty and in
so doing blame their victim; saying it is their (victim) fault they
(the Psychotic) acted like this.
35>40 confirm the Psychotics intentions now delivered.
H. Thus -
may we consider the wondrous trip boat was only ever designed for this
outcome and in so doing gain international support or sympathy for what
on the surface of it may well be support of the beleaguered Jews - in
reality only a continuance of that was labeled as Hitler's desire for
World Supremacy by as yet. People or Institutions
unknowingly created; thus every
one was just Following Orders for the Common Purpose, leaving no one to
take the ultimate responsibility.
I. Leaving one
to ponder "Was it from this the term Anti-Semitic came into
prominence and became a tool of psychotic domineering control and in
itself was as racist as the Person making the statement was labeled.
Common Purpose is a political charity
using Behavioural Modification techniques.
2. Common Purpose - CP is a Charity, based
in Great Britain, which creates. ‘Future Leaders’ of society.
3. CP selects individuals and, ‘trains’ them,
to learn how society works, who, 'pulls the levers of power' and how - CP
‘graduates’ can use this knowledge to lead 'Outside Authority.’
Teenagers and Adults have
their prejudices removed.
5. Graduates; are ‘empowered’ to become
‘Leaders’ and work in ‘partnership’ with other CP graduates.
6. CP claims to have trained some 30,000
adult graduates in UK and changed the lives of some 80,000 People,
including Schoolchildren and young People.
evidence shows that Common Purpose is rather more than a Charity;
‘empowering' People and communities.
8. In fact, CP is an
elitist pro-EU Political Organisation working to replace democracy
the United Kingdom and worldwide,
with CP chosen - ‘Elite’ leaders.
9. In truth,
their hidden networks and political objectives are undermining and
destroying our democratic society and are threatening ‘free will’ in
Adults, Teenagers and Children.
10. Their work is funded by public money and
big business, including international banks.
11. It is important for researchers on this
subject to realise that the majority of Common Purpose 'graduates' are
victims, who have little if any understanding of the wider role of
Common Purpose within United Kingdom society, nor of its connections to
higher government, the European Union and perhaps every country in the
13. Drawn into CP training by a flattering
invitation, or selected by their company or organisation, this
recruitment is normally carried out by a previously trained CP Person -
now recruiting for the cause.
Leaving one to consider one should always beware of strangers bearing
14. Candidates are screened and selected -
or rejected by CP Advisory Board members in their area.
15. Both candidates and 'trained graduates,'
will have no real understanding of Common Purpose's wider role to help
achieve a political and social paradigm shift in the United Kingdom.
The real objective, would appear to be
to replace our traditional United Kingdom democracy with the new regime of the EU super state.
17. By blurring the boundaries between
People, professions, public and private sectors, responsibility and
accountability, CP encourages graduates to believe that as new selected
leaders, CP graduates can work together, outside of the established
political and social structures, to achieve this paradigm shift or
18. The so called.
19. In doing so, the allegiance of the
individual becomes 're-framed' on CP colleagues and their NETWORK.
20. Using behavioural and experiential
learning techniques, the views of graduates can be remolded to conform
to the new Common Purpose.
21. Most will not be aware this has
happened, but we are given immediate clues in descriptions by graduates
- that Common Purpose training is 'life changing,' 'disturbing, or
22. Trained and operating under the Chatham
House rules of secrecy - details of discussion, those present and
location are not disclosed, CP graduates come to operate in; 'their
world,' of Common Purpose.
Mind Control Background on this site for
historical information regarding manipulation of People's free will and
24. The term 'GRADUATE' is used
deliberately so as to prevent disclosure of involvement with Common
25. As 'MEMBERS' of CP, which is more
appropriate, individuals in the public sector would have to declare
26. So strong is the Common Purpose bond,
that some individuals will lie to hide information and documents
considered; 'dangerous,' to the CP cause.
People challenging CP colleagues have
been victimised and forced out of their positions.
28. Common Purpose is linked to a host of
other suspect trusts, foundations, think-tanks, quangos and so called
28. DEMOS is a key example.
29. These organisations funnel political
and social CHANGE policy through CP, to re-frame graduates.
30. Examples range from promotion of
Diversity in every company and organisation, to Curfews for young
31. Common Purpose promotes
'empowerment of individuals,' except where individuals challenge the
activities of CP and public spending on CP.
32. These People are branded vexatious,
extremist, right wing or mentally unsound. Julia Middleton, the
Chief Executive of Common Purpose, praises the work of German bankers.
Deutsche Bank is, of course, a major power behind Common Purpose.
33. Julia Middleton, earning circa £80,000
p.a. from her charity, is also very happy to promote the term; 'USEFUL
IDIOTS' in her book. 'Beyond Authority.'
34. Are we
the General Public the USEFUL IDIOTS, or are the Elitist Common Purpose
Graduates? One must decide for oneself.
35. Common Purpose graduates
cities across the United Kingdom and perhaps many others throughout the
one to realise these People, possibly colleagues or friends, are now; 're-framed' "elite leaders."
overwhelmingly, the taxpayer, has paid for their CP training.
A. The greatest evil is not done in those
sordid dens of evil that Dickens loved to paint ... but is conceived and
ordered - moved, seconded, carried and minuted in clear, carpeted,
warmed, well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars, cut
fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their
B. And we should remember. ... Evil flourishes where good men do nothing.
Is it possible this is all true and we are all being complicit in this
process and its ultimate goal?
Sadly it appears this is so - as no one it appears is able to
suggest why the world is in the constant flux state of unrest.
Question. 2. No one - are you sure?
Answer. 2. Of course and thankfully
so there are it appears since the United Kingdom 2016 Brexit Referendum was
announced more and more People from many countries of the world who have
been on the receiving end of this process are now seeking answer to
questions they were previously unaware existed or perhaps did not have
the courage to ask.
Question. 3. Are you aware of any
Answer. 3. It would be reasonable
to consider Professor Stanley Milgram started the process - yet was
unaware of the consequences; as his life was terminated far too young
for him to have realised, just what he was doing and on whose orders.
Question 4. Where do we go from
A. Over the past years we in the
United Kingdom and the United States of America and in reality I suspect
every country and their citizens in the world have become aware of the
New World Order.
B. One may as indeed did I -
consider this was like an Institutional Body.
C. The reality is the New World
Order is perhaps no more than an Insidious and hidden in clear view
Process of not only world change but World Domination - called World
D. Was it not said way back in the
past. "Control the Money, control the Politicians and one controls the
Laws." And everyone is now following orders and works no longer for the
New World Order but for the Common Purpose.
New World Order changed to Common
A reasonable Person's sensible commentary on the
The Secret Societies in control of the World.
Most People reading this will never have heard of Common Purpose, this
is because, just like the freemasons and the mafia, it is a secret
One way they create their blanket of secrecy is by applying
what they call Chatham House Rules, which basically mean that whatever
happens within Common Purpose stays within Common Purpose.
A. Chatham House Rule - a rule or
principle according to which information disclosed during a meeting
may be reported by those present, but the source of that information
may not be explicitly or implicitly identified. "the conference was
held under the Chatham House Rule."
3. Just as with the
mafia and the freemasons so the members of Common Purpose look after the
Brotherhood in life.
4. But where they are far, far worse is that they seek
to gain and then to abuse power in order to change the world.
5. On the surface Common Purpose are a political charity who offer
management training courses designed so that the various sectors of
society can work together better.
No doubt many People who have attended their courses believe this. But
it is what is really going on.
7. Common Purpose activists are social engineers who want to change the world and
they use Neuro Linguistic Programming to brainwash their course
attendees so as to achieve this.
Just like a religious cult.
9. They want
to divide the world up into two sorts of People, the elite - themselves
who run everything and then everyone else who must do what they are
told as Order Followers.
They want to get rid of nations and nationality - a big part of
the identity that defines us as individuals and to achieve this they
want to get rid of democracy and free speech, which are impediments to
11. The EU is a very important stepping stone to them achieving
The scale of what they have achieved is stunning, with tens of thousands
of graduates they now effectively control the Police, the Conservative
Party, Education, the Civil Service, the BBC, the NHS, the Church
of England, many charities and
How do we
know the New World Order has changed to Common Purpose?
1. We do not - but then
perhaps we should ask ourselves; just how long has the NWO been in
existence: How long have we been aware and What was before.
2. And how if
at all Does Hitler and the Holocaust, with Palestine and Israel and all
of the current unrest within the Muslims - fit into the picture.
3. Surely it must be said.
Society has to be Secret Perhaps they are up to no good for anyone in
the world - otherwise they would not have to be secret."
Leaving one to consider are all of
these entities part of one big family lost in the wilderness of time
seeking understanding through world domination - as God in all of its
forms have as yet failed to demonstrate the absolution demanded.
Common Purpose 1.
1. One of their most powerful tools to enforce their rule upon us is
Making it socially unacceptable to challenge
3. So if you question mass immigration you
are a Racist.
4. If you voted to leave the EU you are a
5. If you object to the
massive scale of rape of white Children by Muslims across Britain you
are like Hitler.
The BBC are one of the main Common Purpose propaganda
mouthpiece and you see this all the time in all their output.
current affairs and news, their “factual” programming, their soap
operas, their comedy, everything.
Every time you listen to or watch the
BBC you are being brainwashed.
Presenters who do not toe the Common
Purpose line have gone, replaced by Social Justice Warriors who do not
realise that they are just useful idiots.
1. Is it possible
Poetical Correctness was the forerunner to New World Order. Or another
way of saying Order Followers.
In addition - is it possible the freedom of
expression we have all felt with the creation of the Internet and the
many social media outlets is gradually being eroded from the
connectedness to many People in other countries and different way of
life could never have dreamed possible in days gone by; with the likes
of possibly Facebook having a content police division; that makes it
appear for Person of foreign decent that has possibly entered the United
Kingdom and other countries under the radar of the law are now supported
by their activity of Child Marriages or Child abuse being alright and
with the perpetrator being sent back to their Family as they are needed
and any one that speaks out against such dismissal of the host country
law and fundamental rights of a Nations People. Is suppressed.
Moreover to this are such companies forgetting the fundamental rule of
Business the customer is the only Person in the business of importance
and all of the business activity whether openly observed or under the
radar - are about providing Jobs for their employees and profits for the
Furthermore. The Gerald Ratner business style activity can very
quickly take the sparkle off the diamonds - otherwise known as profit.
Common Purpose 2.
Common Purpose 3.
1. The BBC, because of this, is in constant and blatant breach of its
2. But this does not matter because all the checks and balances in
place to control the BBC and to ensure neutrality have been taken over
by Common Purpose.
3. The other main propaganda tool is Education.
A. Common Purpose use the Education system to
ensure that our Children leave school brainwashed
with their dogma and at the same time Erases Bright Minded Students
Scientific Inquiry desires.
B. Should we not demand to know just who and
why someone appears to be pulling all of the strings or Giving The
Orders that would normally be regarded as Common Decency.
Common Purpose 4.
1. Right thinking People think that cutting a
Child’s Genitals with a
razor is unacceptable, but to Common Purpose Female Genital Mutilation is just cultural
enrichment that we must learn to accept.
So the Common Purpose police do
nothing to enforce the British law.
3. Yet leave bacon near a Mosque and
the full might of the law will be applied until you are in prison.
4. Because that is a “hate” crime, whilst Female Genital Mutilation
is obviously not.
A. Which is tantamount to saying to
another Person. “You have to believe in god just because I do.”
B. For me history - if we are to believe
what is written, clearly, says and the Child Abuse by the catholic
priests and Atrocities in the name of Allah along with the Jewish/Muslim
race of Circumcision and Female Genital Mutilation; without any
anaesthesia - confirms.
C. God in all of its forms if ever such an
entity existed is the nastiest creation since the earth was formed and
large aggressive creatures were created.
D. I prefer to call all gods - Psychotic
Mankind Control Freaks. Who will stop at nothing to get their own
psychotic way here on Earth.
E. Should we not stand back and take a wider perspective of
this activity and ask; "is everyone just Obediently
Following Orders," yet
do not know what the orders really are and if so "who is giving the
orders," or as this process has been going on for so long - does any one
really know what they are doing and why.
Common Purpose 5.
David Cameron is Common Purpose, as are much of the Conservative Party
- hence they are often called Red Tories now, which explains a lot.
Starting with telling us packs of lies about Brexit.
Lies that were
reinforced by the BBC and all the other Common Purpose controlled
It explains why 40% of GDP is still in the public sector.
It explains why an innocent slip up of speech can get an MP suspended.
It explains why Conservative fiscal policy now punishes personal
financial achievement so much.
And it explains why non EU immigration is
sustained at such massive levels.
Common Purpose tried to massively censor free speech in Britain with the Leveson Inquiry.
Fortunately, in one of the most important pieces of journalism in our
time, the Daily Mail blew the lid on what was going on and we were
saved. Click here
for the Article.
Common Purpose graduates are expected to disobey the orders of their own
Organisation where these conflict with Common Purpose dogma and
Not only that they are expected to root out all non Common
Purpose thinking in their Organisation, which they call “silos.”
end up with Christian religions that are not Christian, a criminal
justice system that blatantly ignores criminals, an education system
that puts politically correct dogma ahead of real knowledge and critical
thinking, a national broadcaster that carpet bombs us with propaganda
and a government that does not answer to democracy.
You might wonder who pays for Common Purpose.
14. The answer is we all do.
The police can send their officers on “training,” to be brainwashed
instead of using the money to patrol our streets -
click here to see one example.
16. The NHS can spend on Common Purpose training instead of on cancer drugs,
your local school will pay to indoctrinate its staff instead of buying
And the 0.7% of British GDP that is spent on foreign aid, a huge chunk
of that is spent by the government - Common Purpose controlled, to
run Common Purpose courses around the world.
You might ask what we can do about this evil.
The only real answer is to
purge every single Common Purpose graduate from the public sector.
must go because they are brainwashed, they have been programmed, they
are like members of religious cults, the evil is embedded inside them.
A. Whether one
works in the Political establishment or the international media -
anything that can mean in their private life they have not been whiter
that white; or have been up to Subversive or Deviant activity, someone
as a subservient Order Follower - will be logging the information
in order to pass it up the line; they have no idea as to where it goes
and what it is used for.
others in a Secret Society and at a higher Degree of the secrets
that underpin Common Purpose - having received this negative
information, the now Victim would not want to be made public, will use
this negative information as a lever to garner the outcome desired in
Order to destroy the United Kingdom and in so doing everything we
believe to be good - not only in this country. But for every country in
And is the
reason why our Politicians and Courts appear to be for Criminal Activity
and not against. Therefor are just Following
Orders for Common Purpose. That is intended to sound - as if it is. "For
the People and the Country."
Common Purpose 6.
To find out more about Common Purpose and to confirm this article visit:
We are all in this together.
Common Purpose Exposed.
Stop Common Purpose.
Common Purpose (CP)
An hidden ever expanding virus in our government,
News media, schools and Universities
1. Although it has 80,000 trainees in 36 cities, 18,000 graduate members
and enormous power, Common Purpose is largely unknown to the general
It recruits and trains “leaders,” to be loyal to the directives of Common
Purpose and the EU, instead of to their own departments, which they then
undermine or subvert, the NHS being an example.
3. Common Purpose is identifying leaders for
recruitment in all levels of our government to
assume power when our nation is replaced by the European Union, in what
they call; “the post democratic society.”
4. They are learning to rule
without regard to democracy and will bring the EU police state home to
every one of us.
Common Purpose is also the glue that enables fraud to be committed
across these government departments to reward pro European local
Corrupt deals are enabled that put property or cash into
their pockets by embezzling public assets.
7. It has members in the NHS, BBC, the Police, the
Legal Profession, the
Church, many of Britain’s 7,000 quangos, local councils, the Civil
Service, Government Ministries, Parliament and it controls many RDA’s
- Regional Development Agencies.
8. It must be considered Common Purpose
has recruits in all of the worlds many secret societies.
Cressida Dick is the Common Purpose senior police officer who authorised
the; “Shoot to kill” policy, without reference to Parliament, the law or
the British Constitution.
Jean de Menezes was one of the innocents who
died as a result.
11. Her shoot to kill policy still stands today.
Common Purpose trained Janet Paraskeva, the Law Society’s Chief
Surprising numbers of lawyers are Common Purpose members.
no coincidence that justice is more expensive, more flawed and more
15. And no surprise the courts refused to uphold the law, when a
challenge was made to the signing of the six EU treaties, which
illegally abolish Britain’s sovereignty.
16. Common Purpose is backed by John Prescott’s. “Office of the Deputy Prime
Minister” - ODPM and its notional Chief Executive is Julia Middleton.
The Head of the Civil Service Commission is a member
17. Leaving one to question is the.
Permanente Government Permanente/Secretary of the Untied Kingdom also a
It is close to controlling Plymouth City Council, where is has subverted
the democratic process.
Local People cannot get the corrupt activities
of Common Purpose published, because the editors of local papers are
recruits of Common Purpose and refuse to
let journalists publish the articles.
Common Purpose started in 1985; in the 1990’s, with its members’ cross departmental
influence, it was involved with what then became the disastrous New
Millennium Dome Company and the squandering of £800 million; it appears
£300 million of this was diverted into the web of quangos set up by Common Purpose.
is a fraud case over this, stalled in the courts thanks to Common Purpose’s
influence in the legal profession.
22. Over £100 million from the Public Purse money has been spent on Common Purpose courses alone and
it has been hidden from the public and members names are a guarded secret.
23. It charges substantial figures for its courses.
24. Matrix for example costs
£3,950 plus VAT and courses for the high flying ‘leader,’ can be as much
as £9,950 plus VAT.
This money is from the public purse, paid by government departments
financing senior staff to become agents for Common Purpose, instead of loyal to
their own jobs.
Common Purpose - Ltd by guarantee, No. 2832875 is registered as charity
No. 1023384. It describes itself as being involved in Adult education.
27. Given it preys on the rich and powerful,
charges expensive fees and its aims are clearly power and control, its
charity status appear to have unsavory implications and should
Everything relating to the kidology or the process of keeping the
populations subservient in any country is clearly explained in the
opening words of this section. "We are all in this together.
" However the reality may be better expressed
as Individuals or even a country - we have never been more alone if we
"Common Purpose Order Followers." As the Process is as the history books
that remain tell us. "Divide and Conquer" is the rule.
Common Purpose 7.
Common Purpose Subjects.
Potential Common Purpose subjects are selected for training.
2. On the bases they are susceptible to being
converted; are they in the right job, with the right colleagues and
3. Do they have power, influence and the
control of money.
If the candidate has some, or all of these key
attributes, then the local Common Purpose Advisory Board decides if they
can do the course.
Common Purpose – training our future EU rulers.
6. Trained leaders are encouraged to act as a network, enable other
members,’ plans and have meetings under the so called Chatham House
7. This effectively means their statements are not attributable to
them, nor can attendees reveal information heard at a Common Purpose
Council Officers are having secret meetings with, for example, property
developer Common Purpose friends.
Conclusion. Item 7 appears to be a
clear indication of the all empowering of Order
Common Purpose 8.
No agendas and No minutes.
Purpose Graduates from the public quangos sectors such as the Regional
Development Agencies attend and have the power to award large sums of
public money to projects.
2. It is the worst national example of cronyism, closed contract bids,
fraud and corruption.
And unseen to the general public.
Common Purpose undermines traditionally effective and efficient
government departments with an overwhelming influx of new language,
political correctness and management initiatives.
The talk is of
empowering communities, vision, worklessness, mainstreaming - sucking EU
money into a project to sustain it, community empowerment, working
partnership, regeneration and celebrating diversity etc etc.
Conclusion. How can a Meeting
of PUBLIC Employees ever have the validity of true Common Purpose by not
having minutes. Secret Minutes may well be easier to accept.
Common Purpose 9.
Change and Re-Organisation.
appear about change and reorganisation.
As CP “leaders” become more senior, they employ countless managers and
In time confusion rules and things do not seem to work
Management decisions are made that seem stupidly destructive.
The organisation’s performance becomes sluggish.
Undermining the NHS is
Common Purpose’s biggest success so far, with bureaucrats outnumbering
hospital staff three to one.
David Cameron, who is pro Europe, uses the language of Common Purpose;
he has appointed Ken Clarke, the most committed of the pro Europeans, in
charge of his “Democracy Taskforce;” rather like putting the cat in
charge of the safety of mice.
Common Purpose specifically targets Children from the age of 13 and
more recently younger, for special leadership and citizenship training.
Yes, it is active in schools and again the average Parent has no idea.
People have contacted awareness Groups to speak of their experiences with Common
A common theme is its all sweetness and light, until you fail
to follow the direction set by the Common Purpose leadership.
A. One does not require the
education status of a professor in history or physics to observe. If a
Person in so weak willed as to follow a lifestyle activity that others
can negatively use against them to become traitors to their own country
- that this process has to have a seed of witting or unwitting status
That brought their Children into the world to ensure they
never suffered the same as they; yet in the final analyses failed to see
they made them into Common Purpose Order
C. Leaving one to ponder from
were does the orders really originate and who creates them.
Common Purpose 10.
Then interesting things happen.
Ladies in particular have been bullied
at work, some have lost their jobs, some have become paranoid and
depressed at the pressure from People ganging up on them.
A typical story is a husband describing the decline in his wife from the
time she becomes a Common Purpose graduate.
Loss of sparkle, enthusiasm, anxious, ‘changed’ and she initiated a divorce.
Other Common Purpose People lie when they are challenged as to their
Common Purpose candidates are given a two day residential course in
which they are ‘trained;’ in a closed residential environment, such as a
They are encouraged to reveal personal information about
themselves, such as their likes, dislikes, ambitions and dreams.
Discussions are then controlled by the course leaders.
have likened this to Delphi technique or the application of group
psychology such as Cognitive Dissonance or brainwashing.
If you suspect Common Purpose is active in your organization, or see a
pattern of incredibly bad decisions,
money being wasted, notice bullying, fraud, or threats, note the names
of those involved - over a thousand have been CP practitioners have been
Publishing the truth about Common Purpose as widely possible may
well have a positive impact on the understanding of the way the United
Kingdom or other countries are being run down -
into what may well be oblivion.
Conclusion. When a Person
is encouraged to reveal personal information
about themselves, such as their likes, dislikes, ambitions, dreams and
aspirations. There can only be two possible outcomes or legitimate
reason for a third party knowing such intimate information.
1. For use in a therapeutic
application designed for the Person to benefit and never the holder of
Profile or Dossier - that later will be used against them in order for
them to confirm they are Common Purpose Order Followers; by carrying out
activities within their organisation or country that may well if the law
was able, be construed as Treason.
Common Purpose 11.
1. Subversion and deceit at work with a Common Purpose to destroy
the United Kingdom, all or many other countries and establish the EU.
EU funding is used as the fuel to power the set up of EU government in
countries and as the fuel for fraud and corruption.
Once a country and
businesses; ‘suck on’ EU funds, they are effectively bought.
By this means
the EU can control businesses, regions and Countries.
Take a few UK examples. £2m plus of EU structural funds is sunk into
developing a film studio in Cornwall.
After 2 years there is found to be
no proper studio, no accounts and no funds.
Has there been an
Yes but with no visible result.
The only local Organisation with responsibility and supposedly accountability for the
EU funds is the GOSW. GRANTMAKERS of Oregon and
And when challenged they hide behind the Office of
the Deputy Prime Minister, itself the centre for all things EU.
Conclusion. Leaving us to
consider as we started. "Nothing is what is
Appears or Seems."
Common Purpose 12.
The EU plan has been Very Simple and Very Clever.
First set up via the
traitors within United Kingdom national government the Regional Development
These were designed to be smooth as silk and sweet as honey –
to do all things good e.g. regeneration, helping communities, helping
business, innovation, entrepreneurship etc etc.
Next load the honey trap with large amounts of money so that People, organisations are
to the honey pot.
As more People are attracted, increase the powers of
the Regional Development Agencies to include planning powers and input.
Make it compulsory for
City Councils, County Councils and District Councils to consult them
and then their power increases further.
And with planning powers they
can get their organisational snouts into virtually every walk of life.
Meanwhile; ‘bring the government to the People,’ by setting up the
Regional Government Offices – remembering Regional = EU.
Government Offices now get increasing powers to interfere in everything
and especially local and strategic planning, because almost nothing gets
done, or built without going through the planning process.
consultation with the Government Offices compulsory.
Now the clever bit. In the background the traitors now work to introduce
the Regional Assemblies.
11. At first un-elected and informal, so as to
allay fears and ease doubts as to their true purpose.
Then the ‘behind
the scenes traitors,’ start to work to make them elected using large
amounts of United Kingdom public money and EU funds.
The process will use anybody it can to sweeten the pill.
A. This section allows us to see -
for generations before the creation of the Eu and since; how we have all
been duped into believing -
all we are told is good for us.
B. Whist at the same time we the
public have not been able to observe - with Social Media having played
its part in what is termed as Divide and
C. With many members of the public
participants making comments and feeling they are making their point;
where the reality is; all is not as it appears
or seems - as no one in authority takes any notice; as they are
now controlled by Common Purpose rules and thus are blind Order
Common Purpose 13.
The Church for
What friendly vicar would help set up a devious political con.
You can trust us they say.
So although one may find it interesting that the many Bishops,
including the then Bishop of Exeter, worked so hard to help set up and
implement the SW Regional Assembly for example, without asking. "Why,"
would the Church require to be involved with
processes - that are clearly of a government nature.
Since all of these bodies, that is the Government Offices of the
Regions, the Regional Assemblies and the Regional Development Agencies
are accountable to the Office Deputy Prime Minster,
it is quickly evident that the real plan
has been to set up a parallel EU government structure in the United Kingdom
- thus nothing to do with the Church.
A. Whilst one is obliged to respect a
Persons fundamental right to not only believe in any of the 4500 - plus
or minus, Gods, there are or have been created, but also pray for their
or loved ones ill health to be restored as often as is required.
B. One also has to accept the reverse
is also true - for those that are not at all, or not quite certain. God
in any form has ever existed.
C. As definitive proof of all of
these factors appears to be seriously lacking in the appearance of God
or Jesus as saviors and Satan and the Devil only spoken of as a threat;
never truly demonstrating their presence -
must only be recognised as a Personal Opinion one has a right
D. Yet - others may not desire to
have the existence of any God lectured to them on so many social media
posting boards. With the words "You must
believe." or similar.
E. Or has it been securely
demonstrated such an all powerful God will or has ever saved the world
or saved any given Person - other than in the Mind of People in ancient
past days who used others lack of knowledge or emotion stability - in
order to control or dominate.
F. In addition; where is the Common
Purpose of the church - namely the Vatican; being the richest business
in the world; yet it appears, does nothing or very little with the funds
donated by the very People that worship God.
G. Yet, it appears none of the funds
ever appear to be returned to the congregation of any given church
- when the property of the churches; the church buildings, are falling
into such disrepair, there are often times they have to be abandoned.
Common Purpose 14.
Set up by
Deceit and Deception.
By making sure that these bodies have the ability
to use massive amounts of funding and staff, they can now start to run
amok over our traditional democratic structure of local government.
The EU grants and funding keeps pouring in.
Take the £320m of Objective
One in Cornwall.
One may include in this Southend on Sea Option 1 2 and 3. Where even to
an untrained eye it is rather easy to observe the outcome for Southend
on Sea was not as the Options intended.
Southend on Sea Option: 1, 2 and 3.
Nobody really knows where that money was spent, except
that it was frittered away in remarkably small sums £500,00 and £150,000
here, £60,000 there etc etc.
By this means and particularly with
minimal proper accounting and probity checks, the money reaches back
pockets, favoured consultants and the dishonest.
The breeding ground for
fraud and corruption has been created and not surprisingly fraud and
corruption begin to run rife.
With it comes the added nastiness of
threats, intimidation and bullying of those who hold up their hand
say look this is illegal.
One surely has to consider just how deep the cut
of this form of corruption actually goes and how much of the United
Kingdoms current debt could have been avoided had this process of the eu
not been in place.
Common Purpose 15.
That Accidentally Predicted the Future
This grim nightmarish, tyrannical, vision of the world in years to come
is looking more plausible all the time.
It is of the future that is now is, at the very least,
3. 2016 has been and 2017 is not looking much better.
A moronic, narcissistic, thin-skinned fraud is under
circumstances that seem sketchier and sketchier by the day and it is
getting harder all the time for the right and the left to find any common
Who could have seen this coming? Or is it a schlocky
exploitation- thriller that happens to be set in the reality of 2017.
vision of 2017 is perhaps of in War waged between the Congressional
Directorate a band of elected rebels.
7. Somewhere in the last free town or city.
A nightmarish, war- torn world ruled by a tyrannical
government regime and populated almost exclusively by suited,
chauvinistic creeps trying to grab their share of the worlds spoils or
control by Common Purpose.
9. Confounding vague. purposely designed to lay out the rules of
universe to make things more confusing.
The government - is the Congressional Directorate that insidiously rose
to power after using; "an experiment in Blindly following Orders under
the derivative named Red Ribbon - a
survey; intended to find out "what" the
citizens of any given town or city wanted to know more about.
Under the directive of Order Following and Common Purpose.
would be very difficult if such a survey was carried out; for although
it may well have had strict instructions from the electorate -
nothing would ever get done.
no one knew who to take the orders from, or who to give the orders too
and if the orders had validation.
D. Thereby creating the understanding
- no one knew what to do or why.
Question. 1. It is fairly clear from
this mass of information the World is either in or heading for some form
of disaster how can we summarize this in order to bring it to a
A. Yes I feel that is a fair
B. I do have to wonder if the People
Behind Common Purpose, its predecessor New World Order and indeed we
must not exclude; Professor Stanley Milgram - for was it not he that
unwittingly or was it on purpose reveled the possibility. People could
be controlled in such a manner as they thought it was the correct and
only way forward.
C. Thus as a result were just as
designed - a body of Order Followers. who must be considered...
Responsible not Guilty.
Quote Talking Cures: The Life we lead is
100% what happens to us first-hand and 100% how we react to it - this
includes all illness.
“Is that saying that we are; “responsible” for our
actions/reactions at all times?
1. Responsible not Guilty – for at
conception we are like a new computer that is of no value unless it has
programs loaded onto it. And of no personal value unless it has our data
2. Thus; at any and every moment in time
our data is one hundred per cent complete and on a twenty four hour
minute by minute bases, updated.
3. Therefore; when new information is
delivered to us, quicker than the speed of the fastest computer or the
speed of light – we, without realising; assess the information, store it
and thereafter react to it accordingly.
4. It is by this process we make decisions
– thus, we never ever make a mistake; as it is, based on the information
to hand and past stored information, the correct thing to do at that
Moment in time.
5. The outcome of all of this - on a minute
by minute updated bases, is always the 100% we run our life by and it
must figure; React too - this, now stored information is and can only be
at; 100% maxim capacity.
6. In other words the stored information is
our 100% Master and we are mere slaves and - 100% React to it.
7. Without this process. New information
would always be just that and be rather like taking a Rural Born Fox
family into a large field and leaving them in them middle - that is
where it will stay; as it is unable to process the new information
against stored memory history and make a decision as to how to React to
Conclusion. Being responsible or
guilty for ones own created actions and lifestyle activities - is not
the same as being an Order follower and have no option but to blindly
follow orders from a superior; as often or not - one would have a
history of being shouted down and left with a fearsome belief; if one
did not follow the orders given by a superior, knowing the Person who
gave the orders would always have a way of blaming the follower if there
was any legal or moral ramifications.
Joining Milgram's dots.
Question. 1. How may we bring
together all the information relating to Professor Stanley Milgram, his
experiments in Obedience, how and if at all they are connected to. New
World Order, Common Purpose and as it appears to suggest - they all
A. Yes of course... There
are many factors more than contained in this expose'...
B. Moreover; they are not
necessarily listed in a logical order as there is no real logical order
- that appears to be the point of Professor Stanley Milgram's study. to
Question. 2. Before you start
your explanation. What is the point of creating confusion; in his
willing participants, within the study?
Answer. 2. I would almost
guarantee the good Professor did not have a clue about the long-term
consequences of creating such Confusion - no more than he would have
known about or even considered the possibility; Confusion is the only
Emotion that exists within a Mind that during life is of any real and
one might add, tangible value.
Question. 3. Before we venture
any further - please explain that last comment; as it makes no sense at
all, let alone. "Common Sense?"
A. Yes - like
Perception is the only Emotion we have at our
disposal whilst we are in Mothers Womb.
B. Confusion is perhaps the only
Emotion - all others are but symptoms of a
reaction to a stimulus that created Confusion.
C. Confusion is the tool we use
to make sense of the mass of information that enters our: Eyes, Ears and
Skin - on a daily basses.
D. And as a response make an
instant - most times, decision as to what our course of action is to be
- based on the information received.
E. This we cannot do without the
Emotion of Confusion.
A. Appears to have told
me about it nicely - but surely did not answer my question?...
B. "What are the
consequences of creating such Confusion?"
A. When a Person - namely a
Child is Traumatised it creates a Confusion; in order to put the
contents of the Trauma into a Logical Sequential order, in other words
make sense of the trauma.
B. When such times as the
Confusion is unable to achieve this - the only response is illness.
C. Therefore it follows - if one
creates Confusion in the manner described in Professor Stanley Milgram's
experiment on Obedience; that created, not only Confusion, but evoked
from the memory store. Information still unresolved from the Persons
Childhood - making the long-term outcome of mysterious illnesses. That will
only defy any treatments.
Question. 5. May we return to pre
Answer. 5... Whilst we are able to
explore the many facets leading from Stanley Milgram's Experiment on
obedience, that under the circumstances have to be explored first - it is
only leading us to a conclusion as perhaps unpalatable; as having to
lifetime be Obedient to Orders, that we feel are not always in our best
The working classes are caught in the vicious trap of self
interest or the requirement to relieve Anxiety.
B. Where the drive for their Daily bread is far more important than unity.
C. One might be minded to call it; "survival," instead of self-interest.
are made up of People drawn to power.
the underdogs become the controlling dogs.
F. Because People tend to mix with
those who are like them, the attraction to power is concentrated by
a form of natural selection.
G. Where; The elites rule. Because they are united in their
H. The Working class is used to
defend the Elite from accountability.
I. Where they stand in front of their
preferred elite in order to protect them from
1. Elite always control
resources the way richest lead society towards extractive institutions -
you can take that to the Bank.
2. Elite never consider any
common man to be a part of their business.
great are only great because we are on our knees. "Let us rise."
think inherent Human dilemma is that those of us who use the escape
velocity to jump to higher orbit of elitism, are seduced by the wealth
and power and become part of the problem not the solution.
is how it has always been.
N. That is why socialists and
communists always complain.
Question. 1. Have we really linked
all of this together regarding Professor Stanley Milgram's position in
history? Or have we missed a serious missing link?
Answer. 1. Yes we are missing a
very important link one Professor Stanley Milgram ascribed too.
Question 2. Are you suggesting he is
Guilty for many of the worlds current atrocities?
Answer. 2. No not at all for
the reality is he was a victim of his own experiments and an Obedient
Order Follower not aware of the consequences of the Orders he had been
given and more importantly who had given them in the very first
Question. 3. Does that mean there is
someone who is guilty?
Answer. 3. Not at all and the
possibility exists no one has ever been guilty only responsible for
their actions as followers of and Obedient to Orders.
Question. 1. Is there a suggestion
all of Professor Stanley Milgram's experiments in Obedience can be
somewhat simply explained?
A. Simply is as it suggest, is
rather too simplistic - as the web of intrigue streams far wider and
cuts much deeper than one could ever imagine and may well be at the
heart of why the entire world is in such turmoil at this moment in 2017.
of the worlds atrocities including the creation of all Gods come under
the guise of this banner and is. "Why the elites appear to rule."
C. Jews and Muslims are all from the same family only with the desire to
dominate the other side of the family sad part is they are destroying
the world in their family feud.
Islam and indeed one might be minded to include Christianity and
Catholicism as well as ALL so called Religions are Satanic like Cults
and nothing to do with Religion; as a peaceful desire, at all.
Rather like a Secret
Society where every one follows orders but no one knows in reality - what the orders
are and who gives them.
F. In simple terms this may well be
referred to as a demonstration of the Soul. Yet is only an expression of
a dream state.
G. Thus like heaven the Soul does not
H. In more complex terms. The Soul is
part of the illusion set up for control by Psychotic Minded People that
Included: God, Jesus, Satan, The Devil and the Holy Ghost, Allah and
Mohammed who through the dream like state called religion controlled the
masses in a secret manner - perhaps to draw attention to lost tribes of
Jews and others deposed by greed and control of a Satanic Cult like
People who created Circumcision and Female Genital Mutilation as a sign
for controlled People like the Jews; to never forget the Pain of being
Question. 2. Are you able to suggest
more clearly how did this all came about?
A. The reality is this is way beyond
my pay grade - thus we are only able to look at the evidence that is
available to us and use our own Integrity and Wisdom to interpret it and
respect others opinions - especially if they appear to contradict our
could suggest Pakistan - that is in turmoil; is at the heart of the
worlds problems and may have a degree of substance to it - however this
is grossly unfair as it appears the entire world is in turmoil.
Therefore we have to consider the possibility the answer lies buried in history.
Although as you know already. I am passionate about and against the negative
part the United Kingdom played in creation of Pakistan from India at
D. Thus I
feel for Pakistan, India and the entire world - as it now appears to now
be controlled by Jews in the same fashion as the creation of Pakistan.
Being Jews and Muslims are a part of the same
family of lost tribes.
E. I am
therefore very mindful of the
part History plays as to why Pakistan has never been able to recover or
create a secure independent identity of its own.
We appear to be drifting away from the debate at hand?
Sadly this is so - surely if we take the main thrust of
this paper is Obedience and Professor Stanley Milgram never was able to
come to a satisfactory conclusion; then there is something outside of
his knowledge or the Scientific Inquiry of his day, that is required to
It appears we are to venture back in history to find the answers
Yes this is so but to be sure our findings are of a
balanced nature - may we accept.
Nothing in History is what it Appeared or Seems today.
How far back do we have to travers?
Let us use a list of countries by first Human Settlement as
known by Archeology Scientists.
A. Though fossils of
been found dating back millions of years, the earliest known
remains are considered to be the bones of five individuals found at
Jebel Irhood, in present day
B. The discovery of these fossils
pushes back the oldest fossil evidence of the homo sapiens by 300,000
C. The previous oldest Homo sapiens
remains came from Omo Kibish, in Ethiopia and date to 195,000 years ago.
D. From this area, Humans spread out
to cover all continents except
E. According to a recent theory,
Humans may have crossed over into the
as early as 125,000 years ago.
F. From the
migration continued into
70,000 years ago and
G. Settlers could have crossed over
New Guinea –
that were united as one continent (Sundaland
Sahul) at the
time due to lower sea levels – as early as 55,000 years ago.
H. Migration into
somewhat longer to occur; the first definite evidence of Human
settlement on this continent has been discovered in southern
Italy and dates
back 43-45,000 years.
I. Settlement of Europe may have
occurred as early as 45,000 years ago, according to genetic research.
populated by Humans at least as early as 14,800 years ago,
though there is great uncertainty about the exact time and manner in
which the Americas were populated.
K. More remote parts of the world,
New Zealand and
not populated until the
Question. 6. Interesting but where
does this fit into our paper?
Answer. 6. The following table shows
any geographical region at some point defined as a
country – not
necessarily a modern-day
– or any geographically distinct area such as an island, with the date
of the first known or Hypothesised-Guessed
Dates are, unless specifically stated, approximate.
A. Settlements are not necessarily
continuous; settled areas in some cases become depopulated due to
environmental conditions, such as
volcanic eruption of
Mt Toba 74,000 years ago.
1. Toba Lake
in northern Sumatra is the world's largest active volcanic caldera.
volcanic eruption that resulted in Lake Toba (100 x 30 km) 74,000 years
ago, is known to have been by far the biggest eruption of the last 2
3. Where applicable, information is
also given on the exact location where the settlement was discovered and
further information about the discovery.
4. Some dates are based on genetic
or matrilinear DNA and not on archaeological finds.
A. Morocco. 300.000
Before the Present. Jebel Irhood - Anatomically modern
remains of five individuals dated 300,000 years old - making them the
oldest remains ever found.
B. Ethiopia. 195.000 BP. Omo Kibish Formation - The Omo remains
found in 1967 near the Ethiopian Kibish Mountains, have been dated as
CA. 195.000 Years old.
C. Sudan. 140.000-160.000 BP. Singa - Anatomically modern Human
remains discovered in 1924 with rare temporal bone pathology.
D. United Arab Emirates. 155.000 BP - Jebel Faya - Stone tools made
by Anatomically Modern Humans.
E. South Africa. 125.000 BP Klasies River Caves - Remains found in
the Klasies River Caves in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa
show signs of Human Hinting, There is some debate as to whether these
remains represent Anatomically Modern Human.
F. Libya. 50,000-180.000 BP. Haua Fteah - Fragments of two
mandibles discovered 1953.
G. Israel. 100,000. Skhul - Quafzeh - Discovered in 1929 and 1935,
remains exhibit a mix of archaic and modern traits and may represent an
early migration from Africa that died out some 80,000 years ago.
H. Oman. 75,000-125,00 BP. Abut. -
Tools found in the Dohfar Govornate correspond with African objects from
the so-called "Nubian complex" taken from 75 125 BP according to
archaeologist Geoffrey I Rose; said Human settlements spread East from
Africa across the Arabian Peninsula.
I. Democratic Republic of the Congo.
90,000 BP - Kantanda Upper Kanliki River. Semliki
Harpoon heads carved from stone.
J. India. 70,080 BP. Jwallpuram
Andhra Pradesh - Recent finds of stone tools in Douala before and after
the Toba super eruption it may have been made by modern humans - but
this is disputed
K. Philippines. 67,000 BP. Callao
Cave - Archeologist, Dr David Mijares with Dr Phil Piper found bones in
a cave near Periblanca, Cagayan in 2010 have been date as being 67, 000
years old, its the earliest Human Fossil ever found in the Asia-Pacific.
L. Egypt. 50,000-80,000 BP. Taramasa
Hill - Skeleton of an 8-10 year old Child discovered in 1994.
50,000 BP. Chihshan Rock Site - Chipped Stone Tool similar to
those of the Changpin Culture on the east coast.
N. Brazil. 41,000-56,000 BP. Pedra
Furada - Charcoal from the oldest layers dated at 41,000-56,000 BP
O. Australia. 48,000 BP. Devils Lair
- The oldest Human Skeletal remains are at the 40,000 year old lake
Mungo remains in New South Wales, but Human ornaments discovered at
Devils Lair in Western Australia have been dated to 48,000 BP. Ochre
fragments at Malakunarja in Northern Territory are dated at 45,000 BP.
P. Japan. 47,000. BP. Lake Nojin -
Genetic research indicates arrival of Humans in Japan by 37,000 BP
Archeological remains at the Telegahana Paleolithic site at lake Nojin
have been dated as early as 47,00 BP.
Q. Laos. 47,000 BP. Tam Pa Ling Cave.
In 2009 an ancient skull was recovered from a cave in the Annamite
Mountains in northern Laos which is at least 46,000 years old, making it
the oldest modern human fossil found to date in south east Asia.
R. Borneo. 34,000-46,000 BP. -
Malaysia Niah Cave -
A Human skull in
Sarawak, Borneo. Archaeologists have claimed a much earlier date for
stone tools found in the Mansuli valley, near Lahad Datu in Sabah, but
precise dating analysis has not yet been published.
45,000 BP. Mount Parnassus -
Geneticist Bryan Sykes identifies; 'Ursula,' as the first of The Seven
Daughters of Eve and the carrier of the mitochondrial haplogroup U. This
hypothetical Woman moved between the mountain caves and the coast of
Greece and based on genetic research represent the first Human
settlement of Europe.
T. Italy. 43,000 - 45,000. Grotto del
Cavallo, Apulia - Two Baby teeth discovered in Apulia
in 1964 are the earliest Modern Human remains yet found in Europe.
U. Indonesia. 45,000. BP. Early
Humans travelled by sea and spread from mainland Asia to New Guinea and
V. United Kingdom. 41,500 -
42,000 BP. Kent's Caverns - Human Jaw fragments found. Torquay Devon
So tell me how does all this link to Milgram?
may we accept my interest was deepened when I observed Milgram made the
point about the Holocaust even though he was born and raised in America.
B. Yet he apparently made no real
attempt to establish the foundation for the Holocaust and then to follow
back in time to confirm his understandings or may we say
C. One -
the foundation for the Holocaust; if we dare say, that it is missing from his understandings as indeed it is missing
from the research I have carried out to establish the foundation for the
D. Since time began the possibility
exists Mankind's Body chemistry - the creator of our evolutionary
change, perhaps aggravated by the Fear - created as the world as it
always made alterations through Volcanic and Seismic activity; has
imploded into Mankind and the resulting Anxiety of now living in a
colder/hotter climate with insufficient food to sustain life that has to
E. That brought about the protection of
ones territory and worse the requirement as the Grass is greener on the
other side of the fence - thinking.
F. That lead to the relief of Anxiety -
can only be achieved by the encroachment of another's land, property and
the acquisition of the as yet hidden intrinsic values of a country.
Homelessness Wandering Lost Tribes.
Question. 1. How have we ended up
from an Experiment on Obedience to this?
Answer. 1. Because there is a
most serious possibility the process of Obedience to Orders given and
received - started as the heading suggests.
But how does that
connect the heading of this section to the 1960 Experiments on
The answer - I am content
to accept there may well be more complex reasons than suggested in this
explanation that Professor Stanley Milgram was either blind too; or as
an Order Follower himself, only carrying out the instructions that
emanated from many degrees of importance higher than he may not even
have known existed; thus is open to expansion.
It surely does not require much of
a thinking process to work out the damage the lost tribes of Jews
and Muslims of thousands of years ago to remind them of the Pain of being
C. As a
Belief - Most if not all beliefs - especially
stored in the sub conscious following and emotional and or physical
trauma are what are destroying lives and the world as we know it.
Sadly it also appears if one is unable to use the
MIND in such understandings the outcome is never for the good of the
Peoples as no one knows what they do or why.
Fake is only a fake when put to test and fails.
Same as Truth as we are told to
The truth is
It is important that someone should step forward and stand beside it.
I. First may we accept. It is a fundamental
right for a Person to have a "Belief" and run their life by it.
J. If we
are to accept this then surely the world would be so much safer if those
with a strong belief could in the same manner Respect others with
Bring this forward to modern times with the combined
just these two factors still not only not relieved the true cause
hidden on the wrong side of history that today has unwittingly forced
People from being "homeless" Best if we express this as "Country less."
Circumcision and Female Gentile Mutilation
How have we jumped from being Homeless to Circumcision and Female
Genital Mutilation and how can we link this to Professor Stanly
Milgram's experiment on Obedience?
A. Always, when I observe the
mysterious goings on
in the world - not only of today - 2017, but forever in the past.
B. I come
back to Male and or Female Circumcision.
C. A bizarre practise - one might
be minded to suggest; of many religions and countries.
D. However not all
carry out both whilst in some countries it is rather like a Religious
style service carried out rather as a public spectacle.
Question. 2. Are there any illness that
could be put down to this seemingly bizarre process other that those we
have already covered?
Answer. 2. There is one I became
aware of recently - where; if many Doctors looked at
Childhood Insensitivity to Pain as a mysterious illness then the answer becomes more clear albeit
Question. 3. Are you suggesting this
CIP is caused by Circumcision - be that Male or Female?
Answer. 3. In the absence of any
Scientific Proof as to the cause - then it is reasonable to consider as
my specialism is with the Mind as the creator of all illness; then. Yes
is the only answer.
If we accept this a
correct is there a suggestion only the Person receiving the Procedure is
Answer. 4. Sadly No. If we look
as Circumcision as a Seed from its seemingly small beginnings it
insidiously grows to produce a tree with many fruits or berries - thus
there is not a Person in the world that does not feel the negative
effects of such a procedure.
Circumcision and Female Gentile Mutilation
5. Is there is no - one country we can set up as an example
that perhaps it will be
acceptable to use as an example?
Three from one. India and West and East
B. Where in 1947 Through the activity of the
English and Partition - the Three countries were created.
Partition of India
in 1947 which accompanied the creation of two
India and Pakistan.
Dominion of India
is today the
Republic of India
Dominion of Pakistan
is today the
Islamic Republic of Pakistan
People's Republic of Bangladesh.
involved the division of two provinces;
based on district-wise
4. The boundary demarcating India and Pakistan became known as
5. It also involved the division of the
British Indian Army,
Royal Indian Navy,
Indian Civil Service,
and the central treasury, between the two new dominions.
6. The partition was set forth in the
Indian Independence Act 1947
and resulted in the dissolution of the
as the British government there was called.
7. The two
self-governing countries of Pakistan and India legally came into
existence at midnight on 14–15 August 1947.
8. The partition
displaced between 10 and 12 million People along
religious lines, creating overwhelming refugee crises in the
newly constituted dominions; there was large-scale violence, with
estimates of loss of life accompanying or preceding the partition
disputed and varying between several hundred
thousand and two million.
9. The violent nature of the partition created an atmosphere of
hostility and suspicion between India and Pakistan that plagues
to the present.
10. The term
partition of India
does not cover the
secession of Bangladesh
from Pakistan in 1971,
11. In such a manner
- as I see it, as intended by the British Raj; the only outcome could be long-term unrest
between the various Religions Groups.
Question. 6. Could
one also consider
Israel and Palestine in the same manner?
Answer. 7. Yes indeed
Israel officially the State of Israel
created in 1948,
is a country in the
and the northern shore of the
B. It has land
to the north,
to the northeast,
on the east, the
to the east and west, respectively and
to the southwest.
C. The country contains
geographically diverse features
within its relatively small area.
seat of government
although the state's sovereignty over
not recognised internationally..
E. In 1947, the
recommending the creation of independent Arab and Jewish states and an
F. The plan was accepted by the
Jewish Agency for Palestine
and rejected by Arab leaders.
G. The next year, the Jewish Agency
"the establishment of a
to be known as the State of Israel.."
Circumcision and Female Gentile Mutilation
seemingly bizarre practise of
Circumcision and Female Genital Mutilation
goes back much further than 1947?
Indeed it very likely does, however
- until we accept the Mind as implicated in this process - we will
never be any different to the lost tribes of Asia and for want of a word
to explain; are Hell bent on destroying the world, in pursuit of finding
a or reclaiming their
Question. 2. Are you able
to put what one may describe - as a Scientific Label on this?
Answer. 2. Yes it is from a
massif Trauma that created Anxiety that has no way of finding any relief
that would satisfy the deep seated subconscious Mind requirement for an understanding no
one could ever provide as there would be an Agenda deep in the Mind that
will never allow this because the desire to relieve the
Anxiety via. "World Domination;"
will never be enough as the Anxiety will always remain.
Question. 3. Is there an example we
could use of this World Domination?
Answer. 3. Any of
the so called Gods - are a perfect example.
How can that be?
Answer. 4. My
understandings are. No Gods ever existed and Religion of no real value to anyone
- let alone
those that follow.
Question. 5. Please explain further?
If we may use the word. "God;" to cover all
such entities - this now belief system; is at its creation, no more that a
Psychotic Controlling Cult.
B. Where. God, Jesus, Satan, Allah, Mohammed,
the Devil and the Holy Ghost - are but one and the same entity; as so called Gods never existed
thus were the creation of Psychotic Men, only as a form of
psychotic control of those with a damaged Mind who believe by worshiping those with
a more serious damaged Mind, decided such a presence was necessary in order to control.
C. This is a bit like having a male organ
yet cutting of the end as a God thing - that is in part in the process
of destroying the
world as we know it.
D. Having had a bit
cut off the end of a Male Penis - the
resulting Anxiety had to be relieved; so domination of the world and
control of the masses became the order of the day.
F. Welcome the Federal Reserve
or control of the world monetary system
- was it
not a circumcised Jew that said publicly. "Control the Money, you
control the politicians, you control the Laws." Resulting in Control of
the worlds populations.
G. Because Such worshipers - having been
sold on God, Jesus and Satan existed - instead of seeing them all as one
entity or a figment of some Damaged Mind control freaks imagination, in
order to control the meek - thus is so doing by worshiping such a freak of
imagination or a ghost; it made them feel good about themselves and
raised their sagging estimation and made them feel worthy, instead of
meek and weak.
A. Peter there
is so much evidence to say there is no God - in fact you would do a very
good job of convincing me that your right as plenty of People have tried to convince me that there
is no God and then I have walked away almost convinced and then God asked
me; "how do you think you got and stayed clean?"
B. I only
have my experience Peter and experience is so much more than just
A. Trying to convince the world God existed
is not the same as People believing in God or even
worshiping the very ground they themselves walk on. This I will support as any
right to do.
B. Surely if
a Person has been or is addicted to a substance - either illegal; or not
in their well health's best interest and something within them decides
to stop this life-damaging activity, is it a wise thing to give away
ones power by saying God did it, instead of saying.
"I admit I was not
working and acting in my best interest so I have now got myself clean."
Thus I am no longer working in Obedience or blindly following orders; I
know not who gave them, why, or even when.
C. If we are able to accept this - then
does not; "I only have my experience Peter and experience is so much more
than just knowledge." Not a confirmation of following orders and
continuing the process of God with. "I am right because of my experience
and you Peter are wrong by default - just because I say so." Failing
to recognise it is only a personal opinion.
Question. 7. Talking about little bits
off the end of a Childs Penis - is that not
where Islam came from?
possibility may well be one could search the entire history of religion
and still not come up with a satisfactory answer one could truly
believe in - as history although the process we all live by; was in
reality only a writers opinion.
1. Is it
possible in the future history will not show how religion and Islam and
Judaism contributed to destroying the entire planet -
by the process of circumcision without anesthetic's; that few People if
any remember having
2. Thus all of the related: Gods, Jesus the Devil, Satan, the Holy
Ghosts are all that just
ghosts or a figment of the imagination from a damaged Mind.
3. Therefore all of
them came from this process leaving us with the consideration they do
not and never did exist.
All of this is very difficult to comprehend is there perhaps some a good markers
historical or otherwise we are able to explore?
A. One has
to consider for
whatever reason the Jews and Muslims - members of one and the same family decided it was a
necessity to Circumcise their Children.
created a Fear that in turn created an Anxiety; a very powerful-painful.
Emotion and Physical feeling being the foundation of all illness - that has no
known cause and no known direction or cure.
C. In order
to relive this anxiety From this the nastiness of so called –
God, Jesus, Satan and all so called religions were created.
D. That in
the millennia of time all the became all powerful non-existent entity
referred to as God. How can this be so when there are reported to be
some 4500 Gods.
Is there a consideration where this
will all lead?
have not seen the worst of this process by a long stretch of the
B. Circumcision and Female Genital
Mutilation may only have been created to remind the Jews and Muslims
they can still feel the pain of separation from their homeland in much
the same way as a Person Self harms.
Your comments speaks volumes of your
integrity and wisdom as having the length and breadth of a true
Psychopath - so desperate to get their own way by shouting others down
with such eloquence of words.
A. Whilst your comment is
recognised and indeed I would not wish to argue - although that is not
the intention; more to provide a different viewpoint just
like so many in history that are now so anti British - despite the worldwide
faults of the United
Kingdom, with words intended to demonstrate. "You are right and everyone
else is wrong by default - just because you say so."
With the often used
words although not clearly addressed to anyone in particular." “Shut
up with your anti Jew/Muslim comments.”
C. Sadly as a result of the
inability to relieve the Anxiety caused by Circumcision.
Soon the Jews and Muslims - when they have collectively dominated the
world; will turn to fighting themselves, as the Anxiety not relieved
will only drive much harder as they will be drawn towards the very
Anxiety they try to draw away from.
D. Whilst we can consider any country that
colonized another or other countries have a part to play - they only
continued the Anxiety caused by Circumcision and at the same time gave
the Anxiety a purpose or, an on going way of relief.
E. The very method by which Anti-Semitic
came into being in the first place and what may well be considered a
concerted effort to dominate the world as there was now a Common Purpose
although not publicly proclaimed.
covering up some Psychotic Person(s) - in the same manner as many words intended,
silenced the Order Followers who blindly followed the Orders no matter
if they are right or wrong or whatever the circumstances.
Circumcision and Female Gentile Mutilation
is very complicated to follow all of this is there a way we can explore
further; or demonstrate the points made?
A. The Holocaust is a fine example - as is
the 1939. “Voyage of the dammed.”
B. Following the first
circumcision - Jews in order to relieve an Anxiety created through the
same circumcision, sought to show the world the Jews,
if indeed they are
a race of People not just a religious cult,
in the same manner; A Muslim is someone who
follows or practices Islam, a monotheistic Abrahamic religion. Muslims
consider the Quran (Koran), their holy book, to be the verbatim...
Are not a Race of People.
homeland of their own, by creating the Holocaust in order to get the
same type of sympathy by using. The Voyage of the Dammed."
C. A luxury liner with
Nine Hundred Jews set sail from Germany to the Americas
and although they had visa were not allowed in to America.
D. Are we really
to believe this was not prearranged by those that allowed the boarding
of so few Jews compared to the 6 Million who reportedly lost their lives to the
holocaust. And if so for what reason.
E. And on a worldwide
bases always seeking Domination via Israel The Vatican and the many
secret societies around the world – who, if they surely had good intent
would not need to be secret.
F. Shouted everyone
down with their words you are being
words that resonate today in order to cover up the illusion and their
post Circumcision Pain.
G. Whilst their family
members and with everyone’s attention diverted - this clearly demonstrates
an insidious process of taking over the world, yet are so
blinded by the Pain post Circumcision; they are unable to see the
consequences of their activity is in no one’s interest.
Is there a hidden message here Women are no longer reproducing as a
result of Female Genital Mutilation and Circumcision?
today there are many countries that frown on Female Genital Mutilation
in some countries that still practise Circumcision. There is the highest population growth rates.
Question. 3. So why the imbalance and is the
population growth part of the same concern as to why - as a case in
point Pakistan is in such turmoil?
A. It is not just Pakistan that
is in turmoil - it is the entire world and although as you know and I am
passionate about the negative part the United Kingdom played in
the creation of Pakistan.
B. I am also very mindful of the part
the long-term History played - as to why Pakistan has never been able to
reconcile all of its internal and external conflicts.
C. That were
designed by the lost tribes of Jews and
Muslims thousands of years ago to remind them of the Pain of being
D. Thus I feel for Pakistan, India and the
entire world now controlled by Jews/Muslims in the same fashion - as they are part
of the same family of lost tribes.
E. Sadly it also appears if one is unable
to use the MIND in such understandings - that the outcome is never for the good
of the Peoples; as no one really knows, what they do or why.
Question. 4. So why is it
God never comes to the assistance of those
that believe and relieves their Pain?
There is a possibility such a question would be met with
more of a dismissal than an answer to the question - as the existence of
God must not be questioned with words such a;
I can feel the sense of
betrayal, doubt and anger in your words and God has a plan for your life that He
designed before you were born.
Is it possible to evaluate or demonstrate from a real story the values
of the existence or not of God?
There may well be yet. I cannot speak for
those I only know by association through my best friend A Sister of
Mercy - a Nun.
B. For although the
many Nuns have - not only
dedicated their lives to this mysterious God they have prayed for his
help, not only for themselves but everyone else.
C. Not once
have I been privileged, if only but second hand - to any information
that any God or so called Son
Jesus ever shone a light on them to improve the illness in their lives - despite praying
for his assistance perhaps many times a day.
D. All that
has happened is Gods partners in crime: Jesus, Satan, the Devil and the
Holy Ghost having worked
hard to make them Order Followers by telling the tale; their God or Jesus will
be there to save us all - whilst at the same time they all became more
and more ill.
E. If anything this belief - a fundamental
right not a gift; I support, makes matters worse as the Person is goaded
into believing no one but God can help.
F. Thus the
possibility that. “God has a plan for our life that He designed before
we were born.” Only confirms God
in all of its meanings was contrived by a Psychotic Man or a group
of Psychotic Men as a cult in order to psychotically control the world.
G. Possibly as a result of
H. No Child
of worth could ever be Born without intercourse and impregnation of a
I. For this in my
Mind has nothing to do with so called Physical Pain that is only a
memory of the Pain the Mind feels.
J. I also have - not a belief; a secure understanding our
Mind is the creator of all illness. No exceptions.
K. With Which - a now
damaged Mind it appears everyone is searching for something; often the
cause of their mysterious illnesses.
L. Thus all "Beliefs," are no more than
a relief of Anxiety that we make permanent and maintain as a driving
force in order to protect us from the same trauma happening again.
M. May I
also suggest. "I think every belief should be examined
before it enters our Subconscious Mind!"
N. Sadly this is not possible - as all
of our personal beliefs are created in our Mind all based on information
received be that Positive Negative or Indifferent.
O. Thus our response can
be in keeping with all three.
P. Often prefixed with the words. "I do
not/will/never want to go through that again."
Q. And as Parents with a
belief. "I will not let my children grow up to suffer in the same manner
as I." They (Parents) always fail to see - especially if their Child is
ill in any manner or dutifully yet negatively is prepared to give their
own life in support of; or follow a cult, their Children, only suffer
much worse and often will stop at nothing with such powerful
R. I always state my point of view
especially in my Surgery - starting with the Worst Case scenario.
S. From this it is almost always very
difficult to be wrong.
T. Now to answer your very eloquent question…
1. As a race of People we must all look at
and re-examine our core Beliefs and start at the worst and request of
2. “Where did we get them and more
important why and how can we positively - as Medical Science tells us it
does. Scientifically Prove our Beliefs were then and still are justified
and with the Pain of the answer be prepared to accept what our Mind –
our Master tells us.” And as a Consequence make the Painful changes
3. There are very many countries and
religions that still advocate as a. “Belief.” Circumcision and Female
Genital Mutilation - the latter often results in “Obstetric Fistula.”
4. Surely; we must not only ask - but be
prepared to act on the answers we receive.
5. Were the creators
of. this. “Belief,” aware of the consequences and indeed is there any
real - not emotional, scientific evidence of the modern outcomes of such
6. Surely if we can
change just this Belief in the Minds of all of the People - the Beliefs
that created such barbaric actions could be changed and many countries
and indeed perhaps the world would be a safer place for all to live in.
Humans will always be drawn towards the anxiety one tries to
draw away from
- often referred to as repeating
In order to avoid the truth we Humans will always Chang the Subject mid
The older I get, the more I realise no one has any idea what
they are actually doing and everyone is just pretending.
4. Writers or speakers typically use allegories as
literary devices or as rhetorical devices that convey hidden meanings
through symbolic figures like God, Jesus and imaginary events - Mary
gave birth to a son via no conception; which together create the dream
like state demanded by cults and sects called Religion and the happy
clapper congregation of followers.
5. If one as found it difficult to follow this paper please consider the
difficulty so many People in history have had in making sense of Orders
they know the have to follow yet have a deep seated feeling something is
not correct about the orders the outcome and the consequences.
Question. 6. I realise
predicting or attempting to read the future is not in your desires with
your recognition it is foolish to attempt to do so and this
comprehensive paper incorporates the
Experiment on Obedience
Order Followers, Common Purpose
New World Order - a somewhat revelation to end 2017 with and now of
course we have the media frenzy of the Tax avoidance Havens of the
Paradise papers - have we now covered all aspects of what one may term
as Following Orders or is there more to come?
Answer. 6. One might be minded to think
- poor Stanley Milgram; what
would he not only think, but feel has happened to the world and its
People he thought he was exploring with his Experiments on Obedience.
For to top it all - yet another method of control of the populations is
beginning to surface; yet we must also consider, it has been there in plain
sight for all but the general populations to notice. Open Society
is the term it is sold to us as.
Question. 7. That is a new
one on me? May we explore it to bring this exploration to a close?
Answer. 7. Yes of
course... Whilst one must take this entire web page as an exploration
into the true meaning of: Obedience, Order Followers, Common Purpose and
now Open Society when one evaluates the way of the World 2017 -
it is clear none of theses processes have ever produced the outcome
desired by the population - a better world; for today more than ever it appears. "If one
has a criminal or immoral intent in ones actions, then there is support
and the victims of such action are somewhat condemned.
Leaving one to ponder are all these processes actually designed
for the good of Mankind or are they a very insidious process designed
for world domination that although in plain sight are presented in such
a smiling manner as to be invisible.
Thus it is imperative we remember
the wisdom derived from the ancient proverb that says...
"Beware of Smiling Strangers bearing Gifts."
Open Society 1.
What's the meaning of the phrase. 'Beware of Greeks bearing gifts'?
Do not trust your enemies.
The origin of the phrase. 'Beware of
Greeks bearing gifts...'
An allusion to the story of the Wooden
Horse of Troy, used by the Greeks to trick their way into the city. It
is recorded in Virgil's Aeneid, Book 2, 19 BC:
"Do not trust the Horse, Trojans.
Whatever it is, I fear the Greeks even when they bring gifts."
Of course that version is a translation.
Another translation, suggests. "Trust not their
presents, nor admit the Horse."
The same thought was also recorded by
Sophocles (496 - 406 BC), in Ajax:
Naught from the
Greeks towards me hath sped well.
So now I find that ancient proverb
Foes' gifts are no gifts: profit bring
Let us now explore in question and answer form...
Open Society 1.
Question. 1. What are. Civil and Political rights?
Civil and political rights are
a class of rights that
protect individuals' freedom from infringement by governments, social
organizations and private individuals.
They ensure one's ability to
participate in the civil
and political life
of the society and state without discrimination or repression.
Question. 2. What is/
Cultural liberalism is a
liberal view of society that stresses the freedom of individuals from
cultural norms and in the words of Thoreau is often expressed as the
right to "march to the beat of a different drummer".
Cultural liberals believe that society
should not impose any specific code of behavior and they see themselves
as defending the moral rights of nonconformists to express their own
identity however they see fit, as long as they do not harm anyone.
The culture wars in politics are
generally disagreements between cultural liberals and cultural
conservatives, as cultural liberals are strongly opposed to censorship
or any kind of oversight of spoken or written material.
They believe that the structure of one's
family and the nature of marriage should be left up to individual
decision and they argue; that as long as one does no harm, no lifestyle
is inherently better than any other.
Because cultural liberalism expresses
the social dimension of liberalism, it is often referred to as "social
liberalism," but is not the same as the political ideology known as
Question. 3. And. Liberal Democracy?
Liberal democracy is
a liberal political
ideology and a form
of government in which representative
democracy operates under the principles
Also called western
democracy, it is characterized by fair, free and competitive elections between multiple
parties, a separation
of powers into different branches
of government, the rule
of law in everyday life as part of an open
society and the equal protection of human
liberties and political
freedoms for all People.
To define the system
in practice, liberal democracies often draw upon a constitution,
either formally written or uncodified,
to delineate the powers of government and enshrine the social
After a period of
sustained expansion throughout the 20th century, liberal democracy
became the predominant political system in the world.
A liberal democracy may take various constitutional
forms: it may be a constitutional
monarchy: Australia, Belgium, Canada,
Japan, Norway, Spain and the United Kingdom or a republic.
France, India, Ireland, the United
It may have a parliamentary
system: Australia, Canada, India, Ireland
and the United Kingdom, a presidential
system: Indonesia and the United States,
or a semi-presidential
Liberal democracies usually have universal
suffrage, granting all adult citizens
the right to vote regardless of race, gender or property ownership.
However, historically some countries regarded as
liberal democracies have had a more limited
franchise and some do not have secret
There may also be qualifications such as voters
being required to register before being allowed to vote.
The decisions made through elections are made not by
all of the citizens, but rather by those who choose to participate by
The liberal democratic
constitution defines the democratic character of the state.
The purpose of a
constitution is often seen as a limit on the authority of the
emphasizes the separation of powers, an independent judiciary and a
system of checks
and balances between branches of
are likely to emphasise the importance of the state being a Rechtsstaat,
i.e. a state that follows the principle of rule
is legitimately exercised only in accordance with written, publicly
disclosed laws adopted
and enforced in accordance with established procedure.
Many democracies use federalism
- also known as vertical separation of power; in
order to prevent abuse and increase public input by dividing governing
powers between municipal, provincial and national governments. e.g.,
Germany where the federal government assumes the main legislative
responsibilities and the federated Länder assume
many executive tasks.
Question. 4. Please explain; Economic liberalism Egalitarianism?
Is a school of thought that prioritizes
equality for all People.
Egalitarian doctrines maintain that all
humans are equal in fundamental worth or social status, according to the
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
According to the Merriam-Webster
Dictionary, the term has two distinct definitions in modern English:
either as a political doctrine that all People should be treated as
equals and have the same political, economic, social and civil rights;
or as a social philosophy advocating the removal of economic
inequalities among People, economic egalitarianism, or the
decentralization of power.
Some sources define egalitarianism as
the point of view that equality reflects the natural state of humanity.
Question. 5. What is a Free market?
In economics, a free
a system in
which the prices for goods and services are determined by the open market and
consumers, in which the laws and forces of supply and demand are free from
any intervention by a government, price-setting monopoly, or other
Question. 6. And Free trade, means?
Free trade is the economic policy of not
discriminating against imports from and exports to foreign
Buyers and sellers from separate
economies may voluntarily trade without the domestic government applying
tariffs, quotas, subsidies or prohibitions on their goods and services.
Free trade is the opposite of trade
protectionism or economic isolationism.
BREAKING DOWN 'Free Trade.'
Politically, a free trade policy may
just be the absence of any other trade policies; the government need not
positively do anything to promote free trade.
This is one reason it is sometimes
referred to as “laissez-faire trade” or “trade liberalization.”
Governments with free trade agreements
(FTAs) do not necessarily abandon all control of taxation of imports and
In modern international trade, very few
so-called FTAs actually fit the textbook definition of free trade.
Economics of Free Trade.
In a free trade regime, both economies
can experience faster growth rates.
This is no different than voluntary
trade between neighbors, towns or states.
Free trade enables domestic workers to
concentrate those goods and services where they have a distinct
comparative advantage, a benefit widely popularized by economist David
Ricardo in his 1817 book “On the Principles of Political Economy and
By expanding the economy’s diversity of
products, knowledge and skills, free trade also encourages
specialization and the division of labour.
Question. 7. What is it to have; Freedom of the press?
With respect to governmental
information, any government may distinguish which materials are public
or protected from disclosure to the public.
State materials are protected due to
either of two reasons: the classification of information as sensitive,
classified or secret, or the relevance of the information to protecting
the national interest.
Many governments are also subject to
sunshine laws or freedom of information legislation that are used to
define the ambit of national interest.
The United Nations' 1948 Universal
Declaration of Human Rights states: "Everyone has the right to freedom
of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions
without interference, to seek, receive and impart information and ideas
through any media regardless of frontiers."
This philosophy is usually accompanied
by legislation ensuring various degrees of freedom of scientific
research - known as scientific freedom, publishing and press.
The depth to which these laws are
entrenched in a country's legal system can go as far down as its
The concept of freedom of speech is
often covered by the same laws as freedom of the press, thereby giving
equal treatment to spoken and published expression.
Question. 8. Does the same apply to; Freedom of
Freedom of religion is a principle that
supports the freedom of an individual or community, in public or
private, to manifest religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship
It also includes the freedom to change
one's religion or belief.
Freedom of religion is considered by
many People and most of the nations to be a fundamental human right.
In a country with a state religion,
freedom of religion is generally considered to mean that the government
permits religious practices of other sects besides the state religion
and does not persecute believers in other faiths.
Freedom of belief is different. It
allows the right to believe what a Person, group or religion wishes, but
it does not necessarily allow the right to practice the religion or
belief openly and outwardly in a public manner.
Question. 9. Is Freedom of speech taken as so?
Freedom of speech is the right to
articulate one's opinions and ideas without fear of government
retaliation or censorship.
The term "freedom of expression" is
sometimes used synonymously, but includes any act of seeking, receiving
and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used.
Freedom of expression is recognized as a
human right under article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights and recognized in international human rights law in the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
Article 19 of the UDHR states that
"everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference"
and "everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right
shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas
of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in
print, in the form of art, or through any other media of choice."
The version of Article 19 in the ICCPR
later amends this by stating that the exercise of these rights carries
"special duties and responsibilities" and may "therefore be subject to
certain restrictions" when necessary.
"For respect of the rights or reputation
of others" or "For the protection of national security or of public
order - order public, or of public health or morals."
Therefore, freedom of speech and
expression may not be recognized as being absolute and common
limitations to freedom of speech relate to libel, slander, obscenity,
pornography, sedition, incitement, fighting words, classified
information, copyright violation, trade secrets, food labeling,
non-disclosure agreements, the right to privacy, the right to be
forgotten, public security and perjury.
Justifications for such include the harm
principle, proposed by John Stuart Mill in On Liberty, which suggests
that: "the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over
any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent
harm to others."
The idea of the "offense principle" is
also used in the justification of speech limitations, describing the
restriction on forms of expression deemed offensive to society,
considering factors such as extent, duration, motives of the speaker and
ease with which it could be avoided.
With the evolution of the digital age,
application of the freedom of speech becomes more controversial as new
means of communication and restrictions arise, for example the Golden
Shield Project, an initiative by Chinese government's Ministry of Public
Security that filters potentially unfavorable data from foreign
The right to freedom of expression has
been interpreted to include the right to take and publish photographs of
strangers in public areas without their permission or knowledge.
Question. 10. How is this explained - Gender Equality?
Gender equality, also known as sexual
equality, is the state of equal ease of access to resources and
opportunities regardless of gender, including economic participation and
decision-making; and the state of valuing different behaviors,
aspirations and needs equally, regardless of gender.
Gender equality, equality between men
and women, entails the concept that all human beings, both men and
women, are free to develop their personal abilities and make choices
without the limitations set by stereotypes, rigid gender roles and
Gender equality means that the different
behaviour, aspirations and needs of Women and Men are considered, valued
and favoured equally.
It does not mean that Women and Men have
to become the same, but that their rights, responsibilities and
opportunities will not depend on whether they are born Male or Female.
Gender equity means fairness of
treatment for Women and Men, according to their respective needs.
This may include equal treatment or
treatment that is different but which is considered equivalent in terms
of rights, benefits, obligations and opportunities.
ABC Of Women
Worker's Rights And Gender Equality, ILO, 2000.
Gender equality is the goal, while
gender neutrality and gender equity are practices and ways of thinking
that help in achieving the goal.
Gender parity, which is used to measure
gender balance in a given situation, can aid in achieving gender
equality but is not the goal in and of itself.
Gender equality is more than equal
representation, it is strongly tied to Women's rights and often requires
As of 2017, the global movement for
gender equality has not incorporated the proposition of genders besides
Women and Men, or gender identities outside of the gender binary.
UNICEF says gender equality "means that
Women and Men and Girls and Boys, enjoy the same rights, resources,
opportunities and protections.
It does not require that Girls and Boys,
or Women and Men, be the same, or that they be treated exactly alike.
On a global scale, achieving gender
equality also requires eliminating harmful practices against Women and
Girls, including sex trafficking, femicide, wartime sexual violence and
other oppression tactics.
UNFPA stated that, "despite many
international agreements affirming their human rights, Women are still
much more likely than Men to be poor and illiterate.
They have less access to property
ownership, credit, training and employment.
They are far less likely than Men to be
politically active and far more likely to be victims of domestic
As of 2017, gender equality is the
fifth of seventeen sustainable development goals of the United Nations.
Gender inequality is measured annually by the United Nations Development
Programs Human Development Reports.
Question. 11. Harm principle
The harm principle holds that the
actions of individuals should only be limited to prevent harm to other
John Stuart Mill articulated this
principle in On Liberty, where he argued that, "The only purpose for
which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized
community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others."
An equivalent was earlier stated in
France's Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen of 1789 as,
"Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no one
else;" hence the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no
limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the
enjoyment of the same rights.
These limits can only be determined by
The belief. That no one should be
forcibly prevented from acting in any way he chooses provided his acts
are not invasive of the free acts of others; has become one of the basic
principles of libertarian politics.
While the phrase, "harm principle," was
not itself used until 1969, the harm principle itself was first fully
articulated by the English thinker John Stuart Mill (1806–1873) in the
first chapter of On Liberty. 1859.
Question. 12. How is Laissez-faire expressed?
Is an economic system in which transactions between private parties are
free from government intervention such as regulation, privileges,
tariffs and subsidies.
Question. 13. What is. Liberty Market economy?
The interconnection between economic and
political freedom from 1949.
The Austrian free market economists
argue - not only that political and economic liberty are inextricably
linked; but that economic liberty is the foundation stone for all
Freedom, as People enjoyed it in the
democratic countries of Western civilization in the years of the old
liberalism’s triumph, was not a product of constitutions, bills of
rights, laws, and statutes.
Those documents aimed only at
safeguarding liberty and freedom, firmly established by the operation of
the market economy, against encroachments on the part of officeholders.
No government and no civil law can
guarantee and bring about freedom otherwise than by supporting and
defending the fundamental institutions of the market economy.
Government means - always coercion and
compulsion and is by necessity the opposite of liberty.
Government is a guarantor of liberty and
is compatible with liberty only if its range is adequately restricted to
the preservation of what is called economic freedom.
Where there is no market economy, the
best-intentioned provisions of constitutions and laws remain a dead
Many others argued for many years - that
economic and political liberty were interlinked and that to destroy one
- such as economic liberty, would eventually harm the other - political
Aiming the argument at the “political
liberals,” i.e. social democrats; who were happy to regulate and control
the economy without thinking that they would thereby end up harming what
they considered to be a higher value, namely political freedom.
Thus goes much further than this with
the premise. “On Freedom” in Human Action; in which it is argued that
political freedom is dependent about flourishing free markets and that
written constitutions merely protect already existing institutions
created by market activities.
If these free market institutions are
weakened too much then the political edifice which is built upon them
will come crashing down.
Question. 14. What does. Natural and legal
legal rights' are two types of
are those that are not dependent on the laws or customs of any
particular culture or government and therefore universal and
i.e., rights that cannot be
repealed or restrained by human laws.
are those bestowed onto a Person by a given
i.e., rights that can be modified, repealed and restrained by human
The concept of
is related to the concept of natural rights.
first appeared in
ancient Greek philosophy
and was referred to by
subsequently alluded to in the
and was then developed in the
Albert the Great
and his pupil
Age of Enlightenment,
the concept of natural laws was used to challenge the
divine right of kings
and became an alternative justification for the establishment of a
- and thus legal rights; in the form of
concept of natural rights is used by others to challenge the legitimacy
of all such establishments.
The idea of
is also closely related to that of natural rights: some acknowledge no
difference between the two, regarding them as synonymous, while others
choose to keep the terms separate to eliminate association with some
features traditionally associated with natural rights.
in particular, are considered beyond the authority of any government or
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
is an important
enshrining one conception of natural rights into international
were traditionally viewed as exclusively
whereas human rights also comprise positive rights.
Even on a
natural rights conception of human rights, the two terms may not be
The proposition that
animals have natural rights
is one that gained the interest of philosophers and legal scholars in
the 20th century and into the 21st.
Question. 15. Positive - Negative liberty?
Two Concepts of Liberty.
Positive liberty... is a valid
I do not know why I should have been
held to doubt this, or, for that matter, the further proposition, that
democratic self-government is a fundamental human need, something
valuable in itself, whether or not it clashes with the claims of
negative liberty or of any other goal...
What I am mainly concerned to establish
is that, whatever may be the common ground between them and whatever is
liable to graver distortion, negative and positive liberty are not the
Isaiah Berlin, Five Essays on Liberty:
"Two Concepts of Liberty" was the
inaugural lecture delivered by the liberal philosopher Isaiah Berlin
before the University of Oxford on 31 October 1958.
It was subsequently published as a
57-page pamphlet by Oxford at the Clarendon Press.
It also appears in the collection of
Berlin's papers entitled Four Essays on Liberty (1969) and was more
recently reissued in a collection entitled simply Liberty (2002).
The essay, with its analytical approach
to the definition of political concepts, re-introduced the study of
political philosophy to the methods of analytic philosophy.
It is also one of Berlin's first
expressions of his ethical ontology of value-pluralism.
Berlin defined negative liberty as the
term "liberty" was used by Thomas Hobbes as the absence of coercion or
interference with agents' possible private actions, by an exterior
He also defined it as a comparatively
recent political ideal, which re-emerged in the late 17th century, after
its slow and inarticulate birth in the Ancient doctrines of Antiphon the
Sophist, the Cyrenaic discipleship and of Octanes after the death of
In an introduction to the essay, Berlin
"As for Otanes, he wished neither to
rule nor to be ruled — the exact opposite of Aristotle's notion of true
This ideal remains isolated and, until
Epicurus, undeveloped... the notion had not explicitly emerged."
"is involved in the answer to the
question 'What, or who, is the source of control or interference that
can determine someone to do, or be, this rather than that?'
The two questions are clearly different,
even though the answers to them may overlap."
Positive liberty may be understood as
self-mastery and includes one's having a role in choosing who governs
the society of which one is a part.
Berlin traced positive liberty from
Aristotle's definition of citizenship, which is historically derived
from the social role of the freemen of classical Athens: it was, Berlin
argued, the liberty in choosing their government granted to citizens and
extolled, most famously, by Pericles.
Berlin granted that both concepts of
liberty represent valid human ideals and that both forms of liberty are
necessary in any free and civilised society.
"liberty in the negative sense involves
an answer to the question: 'What is the area within which the subject; a
Person or group of Persons, is or should be left to do or be what they
are able to do or be, without interference by other Persons'."
For Berlin, negative liberty represents
a different and sometimes contradictory, understanding of the concept of
liberty, which needs to be carefully examined.
Its later proponents (such as
Tocqueville, Constant, Montesquieu, John Locke, David Hume and John
Stuart Mill, who accepted Chrysippus' understanding of
self-determination, insisted that constraint and discipline were the
antithesis of liberty and so were and are, less prone to confusing
liberty and constraint in the manner of rationalists and the
philosophical harbingers of totalitarianism.[citation
This concept of negative liberty,
Berlin argued, constitutes an alternative and sometimes even opposed,
concept to positive liberty and one often closer to the intuitive modern
usage of the word
Abuse of Positive liberty.
Isaiah Berlin notes that historically
positive liberty has proven particularly susceptible to rhetorical
abuse; especially from the 18th century onwards, it has either been
paternalistically re-drawn from the third-person, or conflated with the
concept of negative liberty and thus disguised underlying
Berlin contended that under the
influence of Plato, Aristotle, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Immanuel Kant, and
G. W. F. Hegel, modern political thinkers often conflated positive
liberty with rational action, based upon a rational knowledge to which,
it is argued, only a certain elite or social group has access.
This rationalist conflation was open to
political abuses, which encroached on negative liberty, when such
interpretations of positive liberty were, in the nineteenth century,
used to defend nationalism, paternalism, social engineering, historicism
and collective rational control over human destiny.
Berlin argued that, following this line
of thought, demands for freedom paradoxically could become demands for
forms of collective control and discipline - those deemed necessary for
the "self-mastery" or "self-determination" of nations, classes,
democratic communities and even humanity as a whole.
There is thus an elective affinity, for
Berlin, between positive liberty, when it is rhetorically conflated with
goals imposed from the third-person that the individual is told they
"should" rationally desire, and the justifications for political
totalitarianism, which contrary to value-pluralism, presupposed that
values exist in Pythagorean harmony.
Question. 16. Is there a value in a Permissive Society?
A permissive society is a society in
which social norms become increasingly liberal, especially with regard
to sexual freedom.
This usually accompanies a change in
what is considered deviant.
While typically preserving the rule "do
not harm others," a permissive society would have few other moral or
legal codes - no victimless crimes, for example.
Permissive society can be seen as a
supplement for a free society.
The free society is based on political
and philosophical liberalism of the nineteenth century, while the
permissive society extends the freedom beyond political and intellectual
ones and includes social and moral freedom.
Aspects that have changed recently in
modern permissive societies.
Sexual freedom has increased.
This includes the freedom to take part
in sexual activities which were previously considered unacceptable or
even criminalized, such as BDSM, fetishes and homosexuality.
Freedom to view violent and sexual
material including movies, music, art and literature has increased and
censorship of these and other arts has decreased.
The power of religious groups subsides,
often accompanied by a rising secularism.
Question. 17. Why should Private Property enter into this
Private property is a legal designation
for the ownership of property by non-governmental legal entities.
Private property is distinguishable from
public property, which is owned by a state entity and from collective -
or cooperative) property, which is owned by a group of non-governmental
In Marxist literature, private property
is further distinguished from personal property, which refers to
property for personal use and consumption.
Private property is a legal concept
defined and enforced by a country's political system.
Question. 18. What is the Rule of law Secularism?
Secularism is the principle of the
separation of government institutions and Persons mandated to represent
the state from Religious Institution and Religious Dignitaries - the
attainment of such is termed secularity.
One manifestation of secularism is
asserting the right to be free from religious rule and teachings, or, in
a state declared to be neutral on matters of belief, from the imposition
by government of religion or religious practices upon its People.
Another manifestation of secularism is
the view that public activities and decisions, especially political
ones, should be uninfluenced by Religious beliefs or practices.
Secularism draws its intellectual roots
from Greek and Roman philosophers such as Epicurus and Marcus Aurelius;
from Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke, Denis Diderot, Voltaire,
Baruch Spinoza, James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine and from
more recent freethinkers and atheists such as Robert Ingersoll, Bertrand
Russell and Christopher Hitchens.
The purposes and arguments in support of
secularism vary widely.
In European laicism, it has been argued
that secularism is a movement toward modernization and away from
traditional religious values, also known as secularization.
This type of secularism, on a social or
philosophical level, has often occurred while maintaining an official
state church or other state support of religion.
In the United States, some argue that
state secularism has served to a greater extent to protect religion and
the religious from governmental interference, while secularism on a
social level is less prevalent.
Question. 19. How is it there is a. Separation of Church and State?
The separation of church and state is a
philosophic and jurisprudential concept for defining political distance
in the relationship between religious organizations and the nation
Conceptually, the term refers to the
creation of a secular state, with or without legally explicit church –
state separation and to disestablishment, the changing of an existing,
formal relationship between the church and the state.
In a society, the degree of political
separation between the church and the civil state are determined by the
legal structures and prevalent legal views that define the proper
relationship between organized religion and the state.
The Arm's length principle proposes a
relationship wherein the two, political entities interact as
organizations independent of the authority of the other.
The strict application of secular
principle of laïcité - secularity, is used in France, while secular
societies, such as Denmark and the United Kingdom, maintain a form of
constitutional recognition of an official state religion.
The philosophy of the separation of the
church from the civil state parallels the philosophies of secularism,
disestablishmentarianism, religious liberty and religious pluralism, by
way of which the European states assumed some of the social roles of the
church, the welfare state, a social shift that produced a culturally
secular population and public sphere.
In practice, church–state separation
varies from total separation, mandated by the country's political
constitution, as in India and Singapore, to a state religion, as in the
Question. 20. Does the term Social Contract have meaning today.
The original cover of Thomas Hobbes's
work Leviathan (1651), in which he discusses the concept of the Social
In both moral and political philosophy,
the social contract or political contract is a theory or model,
originating during the Age of Enlightenment, that typically addresses
the questions of the origin of society and the legitimacy of the
authority of the state over the individual.
Social contract arguments typically
posit that individuals have consented, either explicitly or tacitly, to
surrender some of their freedoms and submit to the authority of the
ruler or magistrate - or to the decision of a majority, in exchange for
protection of their remaining rights.
The question of the relation between
natural and legal rights, therefore, is often an aspect of social
The term takes its name from The Social
Contract (Du contrat social ou Principes du droit politique), a 1762
book by Jean-Jacques Rousseau that discussed this concept.
Although the antecedents of social
contract theory are found in antiquity, in Greek and Stoic philosophy
and Roman and Canon Law, the heyday of the social contract was the
mid-17th to early 19th centuries, when it emerged as the leading
doctrine of political legitimacy.
The starting point for most social
contract theories is an examination of the Human condition absent any
political order that Thomas Hobbes termed the "state of nature.".
In this condition, individuals' actions
are bound only by their personal power and conscience.
From this shared starting point, social
contract theorists seek to demonstrate, in different ways, why a
rational individual would voluntarily consent to give up their natural
freedom to obtain the benefits of political order.
Hugo Grotius (1625), Thomas Hobbes
(1651), Samuel Pufendorf (1673), John Locke (1689), Jean-Jacques
Rousseau (1762) and Immanuel Kant (1797) are among the most prominent of
17th- and 18th-century theorists of social contract and natural rights.
Each solved the problem of political
authority in a different way.
Grotius posited that individual human
beings had natural rights.
Thomas Hobbes famously said that in a
"state of nature," Human life would be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish
In the absence of political order and
law, everyone would have unlimited natural freedoms, including the
"right to all things" and thus the freedom to plunder, rape and murder;
there would be an endless "war of all against all" (bellum omnium contra
To avoid this, free men contract with
each other to establish political community, i.e. civil society, through
a social contract in which they all gain security in return for
subjecting themselves to an absolute sovereign, one man or an assembly
Though the sovereign's edicts may well
be arbitrary and tyrannical, Hobbes saw absolute government as the only
alternative to the terrifying anarchy of a state of nature.
Hobbes asserted that humans consent to
abdicate their rights in favor of the absolute authority of government -
whether monarchical or parliamentary.
Pufendorf disputed Hobbes's equation of
a state of nature with war.
Alternatively, John Locke and
Jean-Jacques Rousseau have argued that we gain civil rights in return
for accepting the obligation to respect and defend the rights of others,
giving up some freedoms to do so.
The central assertion of social contract
approaches is that law and political order are not natural, but are
instead Human creations.
The social contract and the political
order it creates are simply the means towards an end - the benefit of
the individuals involved and legitimate only to the extent that they
fulfill their part of the agreement.
According to Hobbes - in whose view
government is not a party to the original contract; citizens are not
obligated to submit to the government when it is too weak to act
effectively to suppress factionalism and civil unrest.
According to other social contract
theorists, when the government fails to secure their natural rights
(Locke) or satisfy the best interests of society (called the "general
will" in Rousseau), citizens can withdraw their obligation to obey, or
change the leadership through elections or other means including, when
Locke believed that natural rights were
inalienable and that the rule of God therefore superseded government
authority and Rousseau believed that democracy - self-rule; was the best
way of ensuring the general welfare while maintaining individual freedom
under the rule of law.
The Lockean concept of the social
contract was invoked in the United States Declaration of Independence.
Social contract theories were eclipsed
in the 19th century in favor of utilitarianism, Hegelianism, Marxism and
were revived in the 20th century, notably in the form of a thought
experiment by John Rawls.
Question. 21. Do we live in a Welfare State.
The welfare state is a concept of
government in which the state plays a key role in the protection and
promotion of the social and economic well-being of its citizens.
It is based on the principles of
equality of opportunity, equitable distribution of wealth and public
responsibility for those unable to avail themselves of the minimal
provisions for a good life.
The general term may cover a variety of
forms of economic and social organization.
The sociologist T.H. Marshall described
the modern welfare state as a distinctive combination of democracy,
welfare and capitalism.
Modern welfare states include Germany,
France, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, as well as the Nordic
countries, such as Iceland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland which
employ a system known as the Nordic model.
Esping-Andersen classified the most
developed welfare state systems into three categories; social
democratic, conservative and liberal.
The welfare state involves a transfer of
funds from the state to the services provided (i.e. healthcare,
education, etc.) as well as directly to individuals - "benefits."
It is funded through redistributionist
taxation and is often referred to as a type of mixed economy.
Such taxation usually includes a larger
income tax for people with higher incomes, called a progressive tax.
Proponents argue that this helps reduce
the income gap between the rich and poor.
Question. 22. Does Open Society have any real validity.
The open society is a concept originally
suggested in 1932 by the French philosopher Henri Bergson and
developed during the Second World War by Austrian-born British
philosopher Karl Popper.
Bergson describes a closed society as a closed
system of Law or Religion.
As such it is static, like a closed Mind.
Bergson suggests that if all traces of civilization were to disappear,
the instincts of the now-closed society would remain for including or
excluding others from it.
In contrast, an open society is dynamic and
inclined to the ideal of moral universalism.
Popper saw the open society as standing on a
historical continuum reaching from the organic, tribal, or closed
society, through the open society marked by a critical attitude to
tradition, up to the abstract or depersonalized society lacking all
face-to-face interaction transactions.
In open societies, the government is
expected to be responsive, tolerant and political mechanisms are said to be
transparent and flexible.
Advocates claim that it is opposed to
Popper saw the classical Greeks as initiating
the long slow transition from tribalism towards the open society and as
facing for the first time the strain imposed by the less personal group
relations entailed thereby.
Whereas tribalistic and collectivist societies
do not distinguish between natural laws and social customs, so that
individuals are unlikely to challenge traditions they believe to have a
sacred or magical basis.
The beginnings of an open society are marked by
a distinction between natural and man-made law and an increase in
personal responsibility and accountability for moral choices - not
incompatible with religious belief.
Popper argued that the ideas of individuality,
criticism and humanitarianism cannot be suppressed once People have
become aware of them and therefore that it is impossible to return to
the closed society, but at the same time recognized the continuing
emotional pull of what he called “the lost group spirit of tribalism,”
as manifested for example in the totalitarianisms of the 20th
While the period since Popper's study has
undoubtedly been marked by the spread of the open society, this may be
attributed less to Popper's advocacy and more to the role of the
economic advances of late modernity.
Growth-based industrial societies
require literacy, anonymity and social mobility from their members - elements incompatible with much traditional-based behavior
but demanding the ever-wider spread of the abstract social relations
Georg Simmel saw as characterizing the metropolitan mental stance.
Popper defined the open society as one "in which
individuals are confronted with personal decisions" as opposed to a
"magical or tribal or collectivist society."
He considered that only democracy provides an
institutional mechanism for reform and leadership change without the
need for bloodshed, revolution or coup d'état.
Modern advocates of the open society suggest
that society would keep no secrets from itself in the public sense, as
all are trusted with the knowledge of all.
Political freedoms and human
rights are claimed to be the foundation of an open society. By whom?
Popper's concept of the open society is
epistemological rather than political.
When Popper wrote The Open Society and
its Enemies, he believed that the social sciences had failed to grasp
the significance and the nature of fascism and communism because these
sciences were based on what he saw to be faulty epistemology.
Totalitarianism forced knowledge to become political
which made critical thinking impossible and led to the destruction of
knowledge in totalitarian countries.
Popper's theory that knowledge is provisional
and fallible implies that society must be open to alternative points of
An open society is associated with cultural and religious
pluralism; it is always open to improvement because knowledge is never
completed but always ongoing: “if we wish to remain human, then there is
only one way, the way into the open society... into the unknown, the
uncertain and insecure.”
In the closed society, claims to certain
knowledge and ultimate truth lead to the attempted imposition of one
version of reality.
Such a society is closed to freedom of thought.
contrast, in an open society each citizen needs to engage in critical
thinking, which requires freedom of thought and expression and the
cultural and legal institutions that can facilitate this.
Humanitarianism, equality and political freedom
are ideally fundamental characteristics of an open society.
recognized by Pericles, a statesman of the Athenian democracy, in his
laudatory funeral oration: "advancement in public life falls to
reputation for capacity, class considerations not being allowed to
interfere with merit; nor again does poverty bar the way, if a man is
able to serve the state, he is not hindered by the obscurity of his
The freedom which we enjoy in our government extends also to
our ordinary life."
Arguably however it was the tension
between a traditional society and the new, more open space of the
emerging polis which most fully marked classical Athens and Popper was very aware
of the continuing emotional appeal of what he called "holism... longing
for the lost unity of tribal life" into the modern world.
Investor and philanthropist George Soros, a
follower of Karl Popper, has argued that sophisticated use of
powerful techniques of subtle deception borrowed from modern advertising
and cognitive science by conservative political operatives such as Frank Luntz and Karl Rove casts doubt on Popper's original conception of open
Because the electorate's perception of
reality can easily be manipulated, democratic political discourse does
not necessarily lead to a better understanding of reality.
Soros argues that besides the
requirements for the separation of powers, free speech, and free
elections, we also need to make explicit a strong commitment to the
pursuit of truth.
"Politicians will respect, rather than manipulate,
reality only if the public cares about the truth and punishes
politicians when it catches them in deliberate deception."
Popper however did not identify the open society
either with democracy or with capitalism or a laissez-faire economy, but
rather with a critical frame of mind on the part of the individual, in
the face of communal group think of whatever kind.
aspect in Popper's thinking is the notion that the truth can be lost.
Critical attitude does not mean that the truth is found.
( 1937). Les Deux Sources de la morale et de la religion, ch. I,
pp. 1-103, & ch. IV, pp. 287–343. Félix Alcan.
( 1977), The Two Sources of Morality and Religion (with left or
right arrow buttons of this link to locate succeeding pages), pp. 18-27,
45-65, 229-34., trs., R. A. Audra and C. Brereton, with the assistance
of W. H. Carter. [Macmillan] Notre Dame.
Henri Bergson, The
Two Sources of Morality and Religion, pp. 20-21. 1935, Macmillan.
K. R. Popper, The
Open Society and its Enemies (1945), v 1:1 and 174–75.
Soros, George, "The
Age of Fallibility," Public Affairs (2006).
Soros, George, Soros
on Soros (John Wiley and Sons, 1995), page 33.
Soros, George, "From
Karl Popper to Karl Rove - and Back", Project Syndicate (November 8,
Liberalism as threat
to the open society: Charles Arthur Willard. Liberalism and the Problem
of Knowledge: A New Rhetoric for Modern Democracy.
When one looks at the complexity of this
section. It is difficult to see how any one man has been able to create
such influence purporting to be as confirmed in Answer 1...
..."Civil and political rights are
a class of rights that
protect individuals' freedom from infringement by governments, social
organizations and private individuals."
"They ensure one's ability to
participate in the civil
and political life
of the society and state without discrimination or repression."
Leaving one to question now nearly 2018 - where
is the evidence these processes have ever worked as herein described; as
it appears there are more countries in debt so serious the interest
alone will never be repaid and illness, despite the Scientific Evidence
base dedicated Doctors all work from, is sweeping the globe like an
Leaving one to consider - if the current
population shift become more than it is currently the Earth may well
shift on its axis.
Open Society 2.
Open Society Foundations.
Open Society Foundations
= Open Society Institute.
April 1993; 24 years ago.
New York City, New York, U.S.
George Soros, Chairman.
Christopher Stone, President.
Jonathan Soros, Global Advisory Board Member.
Open Society Foundations (OSF), formerly the Open
Society Institute, is an international grant making network founded by
business magnate George Soros.
Open Society Foundations financially
support civil society groups around the world, with a stated aim of
advancing justice, education, public health and independent media.
The OSF has branches in 37 countries, encompassing a group of country and regional foundations, such as the
Open Society Initiative for West Africa and the Open Society Initiative
for Southern Africa; its headquarters are in New York, New York.
Since its founding in 1993, OSF has reported
expenditures of over $11 billion.
The group's name is inspired by
Karl Popper's 1945 book The Open Society and Its Enemies.
On May 28, 1984, Soros signed a contract between
the Soros Foundation (New York) and the Hungarian Academy of Sciences,
the founding document of the Soros Foundation Budapest.
followed by several foundations in the region to help countries move
away from communism.
In 1991 the foundation merged with the
pour une Entraide Intellectuelle Européenne, an affiliate of the
Congress for Cultural Freedom, created in 1966 to imbue 'non-conformist'
Eastern European scientists with anti-totalitarian and capitalist
Open Society Institute was created in the United
States in 1993 to support the Soros foundations in Central and Eastern
Europe and the former Soviet Union.
In August 2010, it started using the name of Open
Society Foundations (OSF) to better reflect its role as a funder for
civil society groups around the world.
Soros believes there can be no absolute answers to
political questions because the same principle of reflexivity applies as
in financial markets.
In 2012, Christopher Stone joined the OSF as the
He replaced Aryeh Neier, who served as president from
1993 to 2012.
Stone announced in September 2017 that he was stepping
down as president.
In 2016, the OSF was reportedly the target of a
cyber security breach.
Documents and information reportedly belonging to
the OSF were published by a Web site.
The cyber security breach has been
described as sharing similarities with Russian-linked cyber attacks that
targeted other institutions, such as the Democratic National
In 2017, Soros transferred $18 billion to the
George Soros at the 47th Munich Security Conference
The Open Society Foundations reported annual
expenditures of $827 million in 2014. Its $873 million budget in
2013, ranked as the second largest private philanthropy budget in the
United States, after the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation budget of
According to the foundations' website, 1993-2014
$2.9 billion to defend human rights, especially the rights of
women; ethnic, racial and religious minorities; drug users; sex
workers and LGBTQ communities;
$2.1 billion for education.
$1.6 billion on developing democracy in Eastern Europe and the
former Soviet Union.
$1.5 billion in the United States to promote reform in criminal
justice, drug policy, palliative care, education, immigration, equal
rights and democratic governance.
$737 million for public health issues such as HIV and AIDS, TB,
palliative care, harm reduction and patients' rights.
$214 million to advance the rights of Roma communities in Europe.
Expenditures in 2014 included.
$277.3 million - Rights and Justice.
$238.0 million - Governance and Accountability.
$116.0 million - Administration.
$91.7 million - Education and Youth.
$60.0 million - Health.
$43.8 million - Media and Information.
Within these totals, OSF reported granting at least
$33 million to civil rights and social justice organizations in the
This funding included groups such as the Organization
for Black Struggle and Missourians Organizing for Reform and Empowerment
that supported protests in the wake of the shooting of Trayvon Martin,
the death of Eric Garner, the shooting of Tamir Rice and the shooting of
According to the Center for Responsive
Politics, the OSF spends much of its resources on democratic causes
around the world and has also contributed to groups such as the Tides
OSF has been a major financial supporter of U.S.
immigration reform, including a pathway to citizenship for illegal
OSF projects have included the National Security
and Human Rights Campaign and the Lindesmith Center, which conducted
research on drug reform.
The Library of Congress Soros Foundation Visiting
Fellows Program was initiated in 1990.
There can only be one conclusion one can make or question to ask.
"Where in reality does all of this money come
from." 770 billion and 1777.8 Millions - surely there is
sufficient funds here to erase all poverty for all time;
however I see no evidence of this ever having
George Soros started Open Society in 1993 was he working on his own
initiative or was he no more than one of the Order Followers simply
following Orders no matter what the legal or Moral out come will be.
Open Society 3.
In 2007, Nicolas Guilhot - a senior research
associate of CNRS, wrote in Critical Sociology that the Open Society
Foundations serve to perpetuate institutions which reinforce the
existing social order, as the Ford Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation
have done before them.
Guilhot argues that control over the social
sciences by financial interests has depoliticized this field and reinforced
a capitalist view of modernization.
An OSF effort in 2008 in the African Great Lakes
region aimed at spreading human rights awareness among prostitutes in
Uganda and other nations in the area was not received well by the
Ugandan authorities, who considered it an effort to legalize and
Open Society Foundation has been criticized in
pro-Israel editorials, Tablet Magazine, Arutz Sheva and Jewish Press,
for including funding for the activist groups Adalah and I'lam, which
they say are anti-Israel and support the Boycott, Divestment and
Among the documents released by DCleaks, an OSF report reads...
"For a variety of reasons, we wanted to construct a diversified
portfolio of grants dealing with Israel and Palestine, funding both
Israeli Jewish and PCI - Palestinian Citizens of Israel groups as well
as building a portfolio of Palestinian grants and in all cases to
maintain a low profile and relative distance; particularly on the
NGO monitor, an Israeli NGO, produced a
report which says, "Soros has been a frequent critic of Israeli
government policy and does not consider himself a Zionist, but there is
no evidence that he or his family holds any special hostility or
opposition to the existence of the state of Israel.
This report will
show that their support and that of the Open Society Foundation, has
nevertheless gone to organizations with such agendas."
The report says
its objective is to inform OSF, claiming: "The evidence demonstrates
that Open Society funding contributes significantly to anti-Israel
campaigns in three important respects:
1. Active; in the 'Durban
2. Funding aimed at weakening U.S
support for Israel by
shifting public opinion regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and
3. Funding for Israeli political opposition groups on the fringes
of Israeli society, which use the rhetoric of human rights to advocate
for marginal political goals."
The report concludes...
"Yet, to what
degree Soros, his family and the Open Society Foundation are aware of
the cumulative impact on Israel and of the political warfare conducted
by many of their beneficiaries is an open question."
Several politicians in eastern Europe, including
Liviu Dragnea in Romania and typically right-wing figures Szilard Nemeth
in Hungary, FYROM’s Nikola Gruevski, who called for a "de-Sorosization"
of society and Poland’s Jaroslaw Kaczynski, who has said that
Soros-funded groups want; "societies without identity," regard many of
the NGO groups to be irritants at best and threats at worst.
of those Soros-funded advocacy groups in the region say the renewed
attacks are harassment and intimidation, which became more open after
the election of Donald Trump in the United States.
of the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union, which receives half of its
funding from Soros-backed foundations, claims that Hungarian officials
are; "testing the waters," in an effort to see "what they can get away
As comprehensive as this document is
are you able to make an overall conclusion as to what it means to the
world and its Peoples?
Especially the Open Society as this
appears to be drawing to some form of conclusion although I am unable to
see what that is?
On the face of it one could be forgiven
for thinking this started in 1993, in 1960 or even earlier - mid to late
1939 to mid 1940s and one would not be wrong.
However does the evidence truly support
this - or is one minded to look much further back in history; to such early
times as the history books did not record or some religion or
territorial seeking country ruler in seeking to dominate-destroyed the
available records; thereby making history say as they decided.
If we are able to accept this
understanding, should we not once again ask. "Why."
Or is the answer written and hidden in
plain sight and is an on going process that on the face of it was for
the time extremely clever and in a manner of speaking still is -
however. I do have to wonder; if the modern Order Followers that are the
backbone of Open Society really know what their orders are and what will
be the outcome of following such orders.
I have always thought it was Israel and the Vatican through the many
secret societies seeking to dominate the world as demonstrated by this
written in the sky by a supposedly Chemtrail Airplane a
this is a satanic
sign to those able to read the secret sign - of the start of the next campaign
or completion of a phase of world domination.
The Pentagram has 2 meanings - in its
upright position it represents the five elements of earth, wind, fire,
water & spirit - quintessence/fifth element; with spirit represented by
the top point on the star above the material realm -
mind over matter.
The Satanists invert the pentagram, placing spirit/morality at the base
and the 2 horns of the baphomet/duality placed at the top in defiance of
our true nature.
It needs to be perfect, no broken or uneven lines. So even upright, it
may have secret implications.
Chemtrails in the Sky. The 'broken
pentagram' is also a satanic symbol.
broken pentagram is used in the street layout of Washington D.C....
Even the United Kingdom and London are not it appears free of the
tentacles of secrecy...
Although it is not well known that the separate State of The City of
London is referred to as Babylon? Baby-London.
The Central Masonic centre of London is therefore in Babylon.
From historical records it appear some five times the Central Lodge was
rebuilt it after being destroyed.
There are People that have sought to understand what Babylon 5 is about,
An instrument that Writers or speakers typically use as literary
devices or as rhetorical devices that convey (semi-)hidden meanings
through symbolic figures, actions, imagery, or events, which together
create the moral, spiritual, or political meaning the author wishes to
Evidence appears to be emerging the Masonic Centre of Eurasia
one of many places of Sacrifice, Murder and Sexual abuse.
As the first new capital of the 21st century, the city of Astana
in Kazakhstan has been received by many as a revolution in social
A country plied with Money from rich elite groups and People who
want to build a unique place that lies on top of esoteric foundations.
The city and country is littered with masonic structures and
buildings and all you have to do is look into the sacrificial history
that has surrounded the area and been continuously hidden and is now
Finely we can consider is all of these Ancient Protocols seemingly in
the best interest of Mankind all hidden in plain sight really as
suggested of should we be asking more searching questions...
The TRUTH about Western Europe and the EU from before the UK
The British public and the Peoples of the European Countries have
systematically had the truth about the objectives of the EU/EEC/Common
Market hidden from them; or 'played down,' ever since its inception.
This webpage highlights what was possibly known by the British
Government and others within the now aged protocol - in 1970 prior to
them willingly acceding the UK to the 'Community' and the known loss
of sovereignty that they deliberately sought to
hide from the public as they would give away our national independence,
piece by piece.
The documents were released in 2001 after the 30 year confidentiality
rule but have remained relatively unknown and unpublicized since they
Everything on the documents has already happened at European level and
for the few areas where the United Kingdom currently has an opt-out it
is expected that we will eventually have to opt-in.
Each and every stage of the United Kingdom's membership of the EU will
eventually be released from confidential archives and the British public
will get to see every moment in the history of this European project -
when they were told; one thing while our
Government did or meant another.
Surely the only conclusion one is able to make from all of
this information is...
Lost tribes seeking relief of their Anxiety through
restitution of their lost lands, using the Barbaric act of Circumcision
and other so called religious instruments; that in turn created an
Anxiety of such enormity, nothing will relieve it, other than in their
Minds. World Domination - then someone will understand.
Sad part is Anxiety of this magnitude cannot be relieved by
such actions and in failing to see this as a possibility will only mean
as current events are clearly demonstrating...
Occupation of Others People lands never has in the
long-term proved successful; thus the overcoming the world by stealth
cannot in the long-term mean anything else other than to turn on
whosoever is at the helm at the time, or as the Lost tribes of Israel
tried to do when they sacrificed through devious Order Followers
instruments. Their People during the holocaust.
And finely leaving no option but to
turn on themselves.
Kindest regards and best wishes,
Peter Smith Talking
The truth hurts and so it should - lies and
never ever show the true damage they cause.
Talking Cures welcomes comments on
topic, all comments are automatically posted to this webs page.
"No apologies are made if this paper is seen as simplistic, for too long Scientific Medical Papers have been written in a manner no one truly understands, if this were not so, cures would have long since been found making this paper and Talking Cures unnecessary or redundant.
Whilst it must be recognised, the framework - part of the content, for this paper is in the public domain and credit given to the authors;
Peter Smith Talking Cures asserts the right to be recognised as author and Intellectual
©Copyright holder of his contribution to this document...
"Professor Stanley Milgram (1933-1984) Psychology Experimenter.
Order Followers, Common Purpose, New World Order
Explored Explained Understood."
Author Peter Smith Talking Cures Copyright 25th November 2017.
Thus, this document is free to use as an Education or Patient led assistance in its entirety.